Re: [j-nsp] Configuring 200+ BGP sessions via script

You can also check out https://github.com/respawner/peering-manager On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 5:35 AM Patrick Okui wrote: > On 12 Sep 2018, at 15:15 EAT, Matthew Crocker wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I’m turning up some peering in New York in the coming weeks (NYIIX, > > DE-CIX) and will need to

Re: [j-nsp] Strange Behavior after ISSU from 13.3R8 to 17.4R1.16

Scratch that. Problem still exist. ☹ *From:* Jeffrey Nikoletich <je...@xfernet.com> *Sent:* May 27, 2018 07:43 PM *To:* juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net *Subject:* RE: Strange Behavior after ISSU from 13.3R8 to 17.4R1.16 All, So after I sent this email I noticed a had a rogue rib

Re: [j-nsp] Strange Behavior after ISSU from 13.3R8 to 17.4R1.16

Nikoletich *From:* Jeffrey Nikoletich <je...@xfernet.com> *Sent:* May 27, 2018 07:02 PM *To:* juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net *Subject:* Strange Behavior after ISSU from 13.3R8 to 17.4R1.16 Hello all, So I have been scratching my head at a weird issue I am seeing on only 1 of our devices after

[j-nsp] Strange Behavior after ISSU from 13.3R8 to 17.4R1.16

p would be appreciated. Thanks. Jeffrey Nikoletich ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Push Multiple Vlans into a single Vlan

Hello, I couldn’t think of a good *subject* so *hopefully* I describe it better. I have been pulling my hair out thinking of *this* and I know it should be something simple. I have a downstream customer that is pushing *2* *vlans* to me that I need to send an upstream provider inside another

Re: [j-nsp] SRX Deployment Questions

Hello, This is the version. JUNOS Software Release [12.3X48-D30.7] I do not think I am using SOF. Where can I find some reference material to that? * Regards, Jeffrey Nikoletich - Chief Information Officer | 213-201-6080 Xfernet | 1-855-XFERNETPh 213-201-6080

Re: [j-nsp] SRX Deployment Questions

, Jeffrey Nikoletich - Chief Information Officer | 213-201-6080 Xfernet | 1-855-XFERNETPh 213-201-6080 | http://www.xfernet.net ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] SRX Deployment Questions

So I did some testing with the tcp-mss setting and they did not seem to help. Oddly enough when I disabled one of the AE interfaces (xe-x/x/x) I then was able to get ample speeds. Any idea why? Is there a way to have AE interfaces in a active/passive setup? * Regards, Jeffrey

Re: [j-nsp] SRX Deployment Questions

What do you guys recommend? * Regards, Jeffrey Nikoletich - Chief Information Officer | 213-201-6080 Xfernet | 1-855-XFERNETPh 213-201-6080 | http://www.xfernet.net ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [j-nsp] SRX Deployment Questions

aggregated-ether-options { link-speed 10g; } unit 0 { family inet { address 10.X.X.1/16; jeffn> Regards, Jeffrey Nikoletich - Chief Information Officer | 213-201-6080 Xfernet | 1-855-XFERNETPh 213

[j-nsp] SRX Deployment Questions

interfaces were only passing traffic via a single interface? Any reason why? Also does this setup look "sane" just wanted some feedback as this is our first SRX deployment. Thanks in advance. Regards, Jeffrey Nikoletich - Chief Information Officer | 213-201-6080 Xferne

[j-nsp] Juniper MX + Cisco RSVP-TE/LSP

t size 92 Timeout for seq 2 Request for seq 5, to interface 196616, no label stack., packet size 92 Timeout for seq 3 Timeout for seq 4 Timeout for seq 5 --- lsping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss So any help is appreciated.

[j-nsp] Routeserver next hop issue.

Hello Everyone, First post here. We recently switched from Cisco to juniper and it has been an adventure to say the least. We are running in to an issue with BGP session with peering exchanges route servers. The session comes online and doing a received-protocol it is showing the correct next hop