Aaron Daubman wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm curious as to why the following did not throw an overlapping
> address error when committed:
Why should it? It is just a more specific route.
According to what you say you would not be able to route a /48 to one
direction and a piece of it to another int
Aaron Daubman wrote:
> Jeroen,
>
> Thanks for the reply...
>
>> Which is also 'overlapping', but why would it error or even warn about
>> that? it is what what you want it to do isn't it?
>
> I suppose a better question would be "why would IOS error on such a
> configuration?"
While the right q
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> Looks like there was a cut in the primary fiber line going through
> Relay, MD on the 15th. And before they could get it fixed, on the 17th
> the backup fiber path was cut accidentally by CTX. At least, that's
> what it seems like piecing together a few different bits
3 matches
Mail list logo