David-
Yeah, I guess done details are in order. Sent the first email in a
hurry.
The unit is set for vlan 572 and encap vlan-ccc. The physical is set
with encap flexible-ethernet-services since vlan 4000 us being used as
an IP interface.
-joe
On Feb 11, 2009, at 7:46 PM, "David Ball" <davidtb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Using 'encapsulation ethernet-ccc' on your MX ints for transparency ?
David B
2009/2/11 Joseph Soricelli <j...@proteus.net>:
All-
Got a simple L2VPN setup with some 7609 as CE and MX480 (9.2R3) as
PE (no P
boxes).
7609----MX480-1----MX480-2----7609
CE PE PE CE
L2VPN comes up with no issues. In troubleshooting some intermittent
ping and
L3 issues from the 7609 side I notice that the switches do not see
each
other via CDP, nor to they seem to be seeing each other via STP.
It hasn't been THAT long since I was doing one of these last but
I'll be
darned if I can recall this specific tidbit. So, am I crazy, or
should those
packets be passed through the L2VPN just fine?
As a side note, I think the problem might actually be on the 7609
side since
I see output packet stats on the PE but no inbound packet stats on
the CE.
But, I gotta make sure my STP/CDP assumption is correct before I
start
throwing stones! ;-)
Thanks,
Joe
Joseph Soricelli
JNCIE #14/ CCIE #4803
703-980-3999
j...@proteus.net
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
