Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper

There are x86 based routing platforms doing many tens of Gbps easily in software. Things like vpp.io, DPDK, and others are driving things like FRR, Cumulus, and now TNSR drastically forward. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:40 AM wrote: > On 04/09/2018 08:07 PM, Chris via juniper-nsp wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [j-nsp] tl1 transaction language

https://noc.surfsara.nl/nrg/TL1-Toolkit/ On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:31 PM, jayshankar nair via juniper-nsp wrote: > Hi, > I am working on tl1 transaction language1 for management of network elements. > Is there any documentation or sample code ( C/Linux) available. > All help appreciated. > Thank

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5048 - 40 gbps ER 40 km optic

Wrap it around a pencil a few times On Oct 5, 2017 8:34 AM, "Chuck Anderson" wrote: > Insert a 3dB or 7dB attenuator pad for lab testing. In a pinch (no pun > intended) you can take a fiber jumper and bend it tightly into a loop (like > 1/4" diameter) to attenuate the signal, but I would use a

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX

Disclaimer: I have not used vMX. You might be better off going with something like VyOS/Vyatta. A quad core high clock xeon with 8+ GB of RAM and a PCIE ASIC like a Chelsio T420 (or better) would probably serve you well, and will have a very similar syntax. Just a thought. On Sep 9, 2016 12:28 P

Re: [j-nsp] MPC-3D-16XGE-SFP

ps). > > This is the definition of "full line rate" with these MPC2 cards. > > Regards > > Dragan > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Josh Reynolds > wrote: > >> Is it actually SFPP? If so, I've had a couple of these. With a regular SCB >>

Re: [j-nsp] MPC-3D-16XGE-SFP

Is it actually SFPP? If so, I've had a couple of these. With a regular SCB you can only run line rate on 12 ports. With the enhanced SCB you can run line rate on all 16, if memory serves. Supports GE and 10G SFP modules. I don't know about any warnings or concerns on your chassis as I ran these on

Re: [j-nsp] Basic NAT44 on MS-MPC implementation help

-excluded-from-nat set firewall family inet service-filter sf-out term 1 then skip On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Here's what I've got going on now... > > set services nat pool centralolt01 address xx.yy.196.3/32 > set services nat rule cgnat match

Re: [j-nsp] Basic NAT44 on MS-MPC implementation help

n't know how to go about fixing that. Any help or insight would be appreciated. Thank you. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Hi all. > > I've gone through quite a few pages of juniper techpubs, but I'm > having a problem figuring out how to correc

[j-nsp] Basic NAT44 on MS-MPC implementation help

Hi all. I've gone through quite a few pages of juniper techpubs, but I'm having a problem figuring out how to correctly implement your standard, run of the mill NAT (ipv4) using an MS-MPC-128 Part of this may be design or topology related, and I was wondering if someone could help me figure out a

Re: [j-nsp] mixed interface, switching + routed

ve a quick example config I might be able to work off of? Thank you! On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > > On Tue 2016-Jul-05 13:23:38 -0500, Josh Reynolds > wrote: > >> EX4500 > > > This would be done with flexible-ethernet-services on MX, but I don

Re: [j-nsp] mixed interface, switching + routed

EX4500 On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > > On Tue 2016-Jul-05 13:17:52 -0500, Josh Reynolds > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm sure this is a fairly basic question, but I'm having trouble >> finding a solution. >> >>

[j-nsp] mixed interface, switching + routed

Hello, I'm sure this is a fairly basic question, but I'm having trouble finding a solution. I have a port that is currently an ethernet switching port, set in access mode that is tagging a vlan for upstream. This works fine. What I'd like to do, is add a sub interface on the master port (say, uni

Re: [j-nsp] Questions about T640

Any reason to not go with the MX line here? On Apr 10, 2016 11:55 PM, "Alireza Soltanian" wrote: > Hi everybody > > We are going to change our M320 router with T640. There are some concerns > about supported features on T640. We need to have following features on > this > router: > > > > 1-

Re: [j-nsp] Best Place to Buy Used Juniper

Either directly from Juniper, or Terabit Systems. Juniper will come with TAC but the price will be a lot higher. Terabit will give you no TAC access, but better pricing and 1yr hardware warranty. On Mar 26, 2016 12:11 PM, "Colton Conor" wrote: > Where is the best place to buy used Juniper gear? >

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:50:44PM -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC >> locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the >> 1st card won't boot in th

Re: [j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

50 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Hi all. > > Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC > locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the > 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried > se

[j-nsp] MX960 2x MS-MPC-128

Hi all. Pair of MS-MPC-128's. 1st card boots, second card doesn't. Swapped FPC locations, now the 2nd card boots in the first card's spot, but the 1st card won't boot in the previous spot of the 2nd card. Have tried several other slots for the 2nd card the with same results. show chassis hardware