Just a guess but try ^ $ to match beginning and end with nothing in
between. Or you can match against ^ 1234{0,1} $ which matches the
null as or a single occurrence of only AS 1234 (just insert any unused
AS).
-J Scott
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Leah Lynch leah.ly...@clearwire.com wrote:
Does anyone know how to show licensing info (through cli specifically
for MS-DPC) or know of a doc specifically related to MS-DPC for MX
series (again, cli, not marketing)? I can't find any cli command to
confirm we have the licenses required, nor do I see any error messages
saying that there is
I don't have time to get all of it but very quickly the command you mentioned:
set chassis network-services ip;
refers to if you want this MX to be a L2 or L3 box. Changing this
requires a reset AFAIK. When in network-services ethernet mode you
can only use the DPC-X cards which are priced
Yes what you see is correct behavior (for those MX DPCs). I doubt it's a
cell size issue or you would see a saw-tooth. Instead what you can infer is
that each of the 4 PFE's are limited to the packets-per-second they can
process depending on the transport type involved. I.E. VPLS is really bad
In lab tests, RSVP success during ISSU was hit-or-miss. There were several
cases that is did work but It seemed to be not entirely based on
configuration (some degree of random failure). AFAIK it still hasn't been
officially listed as supported in release notes or upgrade guides. Am I
missing
A book that did well for my colleagues was
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Advanced-QoS-for-Multi-Service-Based-IP-Mpls-Networks/Ram-Balakrishnan/e/9780470293690although
it's ALU-centric.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Ibariouen Khalid
ibariouen.kha...@ericsson.com wrote:
Dear community
The datasheet for the new MX 3D line cards is a little strange. Assuming
that a find-and-replace of KB to K will make it more coherent, this is
an awesome amount of queues when comparing to competitors. However, the new
FPC/PIC-like card strategy is in 30Gb/s and 60Gb/s flavors. Given that the
,
Nilesh.
On 10/22/09 6:31 PM, Judah Scott judah.scott@gmail.com wrote:
I am just starting to look into the scripting abilities of the JUNOS
software and am wondering just in general how it interacts with the
configuration performed through CLI. I have some general questions
Thanks Phil. Both responses are very helpful. Just a quick clarification
on:
Long answer: Commit scripts can emit both normal changes and
transient changes, and an op script can make data (say by defining
an apply-macro) that will trigger an op script to make transient
changes, but an op script
Got it. Thanks for taking the time to explain all that.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Phil Shafer p...@juniper.net wrote:
Judah Scott writes:
What is a transient change?
Here's some (long-ish) explanatory text:
You can use commit scripts to generate transient changes, which
I am just starting to look into the scripting abilities of the JUNOS
software and am wondering just in general how it interacts with the
configuration performed through CLI. I have some general questions such as:
When a configuration change happens simultaneously as an admin is building a
I think the most important note on regexp in as-path is that the basic
matching unit is the AS number and not individual characters. For AS-Path,
the guide notes the ! as not operator and no mention of the [^] which is the
negated character set, or except operator, as Paul mentioned.
However,
Without testing It seems like:
set as-path 100not1000orig .* 100 .* (!1000)$
should work.
Thanks,
J Scott
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Fahad Khan fahad.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
what should be the As-path reg expression for getting the routes transiting
AS 100 and not
When testing IGMP join rates I see an unusual rate of ~500pps. In an
example I look at interface stats and see 1000 packets in, 539 input to
local, 461 input to transit. Corresponding to this I see 539 IGMP groups
setup. If I burst the same range again in the next second I don't learn any
more.
Thanks everyone for your help/examples. I tried this with an all-JUNOS
topology and node-link-protection worked. One important thing to note is
that a complete Route-Record on the primary lsp seems required for
node-protection. Also, 'set protocols rsvp [interface] link-protection' is
required
Anyone have a config example of Fast Reroute Node Protection? The mpls
config guide is unclear which interface (the primary path interface or the
bypass path interface) you must add link-protection and bypass blocks
to. My bypass is not being used.
I've tried but can only get a dynamic
Thanks all for your help, however still only link protection is being
created instead of the desired node protection. I am going to use a transit
lsp case for my example. The ted database shows links which if you take
time to map it out visually could/should be used to provide node protection
17 matches
Mail list logo