On 4/16/2012 4:35 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 04/15/2012 09:01 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:17:51PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 13/04/12 16:11, Jose Madrid wrote:
Why not just use monitor interface? I have used it in the past
and its a
tcp-dump like output.
That just
On 8/13/2011 9:37 AM, OBrien, Will wrote:
Agreed. You'll be well served to do these by hand. Especially given screenos's
habit of not displaying all of a multipart policy on the command line.
However, it's a pretty simple task to migrate the address entries to the
address book format.
Once
bad to make the switch.
Thank you again for your input.
_
From: Kevin Cullimore [kcull...@runbox.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 3:16 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Converting ASA-5540 to SRX-650
On 7/29/2011 2:37 AM, Ben Dale wrote
On 7/29/2011 2:37 AM, Ben Dale wrote:
Hi Jon,
On 28/07/2011, at 1:15 PM, Paulhamus, Jon wrote:
Hello all -
I am in the process of replacing an aging Cisco ASA-5540 with an SRX-650. The
ASA has a large number of static NAT translations, as well as many outbound
source NAT pools. Does
On 6/20/2011 9:32 AM, Jason Lavoie wrote:
Full Disclosure: I occasionally do this (cross-platform/manufacturer
firewall migrations) for a living.
On 06/20, Altaf Ahmad wrote:
I tried I2J tool but it does not translate the ASA commands to JUNOS. I
am having very big configuration ASA files
On 12/17/2010 6:06 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Crist Clark
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 5:12 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Free Certification
On 11/30/2010 8:47 PM, David Lockuan wrote:
Hi guys,
I was testing the hidden command of JunOS, monitor traffic write-file
name_files interface xx-X/X/X. In theory, this files is with format
tcpdump but when I try to see with Wireshark, it don't show me on detail of
the packet.
I see that
SunnyDay wrote:
Hello a stupid question maybe.
When i ping to a host i can see from the logging of the firewall this:
192.168.40.10:24064 192.168.100.11:512 192.168.40.10:24064
192.168.100.11:512 ICMP
my question is this i thing that icmp does not have a port,why do i
get a
8 matches
Mail list logo
