Re: [j-nsp] Junos 20 - slow RPD

2022-03-23 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 3/22/22 22:42, Mihai via juniper-nsp wrote: Hi Saku, The routes are in VRF so no support for rib-sharding unfortunately. This MX204 is running 20.2R3-S3 so probably the only option is to try another version. We've had some terrible experiences with RPD due to NSR sync. to re1 for

Re: [j-nsp] Opinions on Source Class Usage / Destination Class Usage (SCU/DCU)

2022-01-19 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 1/19/22 13:13, Felix Stolba via juniper-nsp wrote: Hi list, Anyone able to help me out with some real world experience about Junos Source Class Usage (SCU) and Destination Class Usage (DCU)? We're considering this feature to gain a little more flexibility with our legacy SNMP-based

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 scale/performance

2022-01-16 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 1/16/22 12:00, Robert Hass via juniper-nsp wrote: Hi I'm stating network reorganization moving our infrastructure from Cisco machines to bunch of MX204 routers. I have few questions related to MX204 scale and performance: 1) How big ACLs are supported on MX204 ? (number of entries for

Re: [j-nsp] SPC3 card with Minor Errors

2021-12-20 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 12/20/21 21:52, Jan Chrillesen via juniper-nsp wrote: A few comments from here. I would suggest you go with the latest SR (19.4R3-S6) instead of 19.4R3 This was my initial thinking as well. We hit many issues on 19.4R3, especially on LDPv6 and some RPD CPU utilization impact. Since

[j-nsp] RPKI-Based Policy Without Route Refresh

2021-11-22 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
Randy will be presenting draft-ymbk-sidrops-rov-no-rr during RIPE-83, at around 1530hrs UTC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ymbk-sidrops-rov-no-rr-02 Most grateful if you can join, and provide some initial feedback. Thanks. Mark. ___

Re: [j-nsp] Cut through and buffer questions

2021-11-19 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 11/19/21 17:05, Thomas Bellman via juniper-nsp wrote: [1] Of the 12 Mbyte buffer space in Trident 2, which is used in QFX5100 and EX4600, 3 Mbyte is used for per-port dedicated buffers, and 9 Mbyte is shared between all ports. I believe on later chips an even larger

Re: [j-nsp] ISSU offlined mpc - why?

2021-09-02 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 9/2/21 14:56, Jerry Jones wrote: I view ISSU as a script to simplify upgrades - not provide for hitless. Terrible namig on Junipers part. You can perform manually with less downtime if any. This is what we do, because you would be scheduling an outage window anyway. Works, and is

Re: [j-nsp] ISSU offlined mpc - why?

2021-09-02 Thread Mark Tinka via juniper-nsp
On 9/1/21 18:44, Mike via juniper-nsp wrote: Hello,     I did an issu upgrade on an MX240 with dual routing engines, going from 15.1R6 to 17.4R2, and I had reviewed the fine manuals particularly concerning advance steps to ensure nonstop routing and so forth. But during the upgrade (near

<    1   2