Re: [j-nsp] Double-tagging on EX

2012-02-22 Thread Martin Levin
. --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Chris Kawchuk juniperd...@gmail.com Till:Alexander Frolkin a...@eldamar.org.uk Kopia:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Datum:2012-02-22 17:14 Ärende:Re: [j-nsp] Double-tagging on EX You're out of luck. There's no way I've found to come

Re: [j-nsp] Strange behaviour MX and VPLS

2011-10-07 Thread Martin Levin
{ description sthu_plan1_duc_nya; encapsulation vlan-vpls; vlan-tags outer 551 inner 14; family vpls { core-facing; } } In this case the equipment connected to the two interfaces won't be able to communicate with each other. //Martin --- Martin Levin IT-strategy

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 Air Flow

2010-11-03 Thread Martin Levin
necessarily give you the right impression. --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Bjørn Skovlundskovl...@gmail.com Till:Bill Blackford bblackf...@nwresd.k12.or.us Kopia:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Datum:2010-11-03 10:40 Ärende:Re: [j-nsp] EX4200

Re: [j-nsp] Understanding DPC Cards

2010-05-04 Thread Martin Levin
I'll try to help... We also run MX and EX. So, first off. MX and EX are not even remotely related in respect to what they can and can not do. The MX is a L3 box with L2 capabilities, the EX is a L2 box with L3 capabilities. So, vlans in an MX are not global (at least not necessarily). This

[j-nsp] High memory usage on EX4200 stack

2010-03-30 Thread Martin Levin
without problem however. Any thoughts? --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 resilience (VC vs 10GB cross-connect)

2010-01-13 Thread Martin Levin
No, it is currently not possible to upgrade a VC stack one member at a time. I have told my Juniper contacts that this is an important feature for us but so far no luck! --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Joe Hughes joeyconcr...@gmail.com Till:juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10GE XFP

2009-12-16 Thread Martin Levin
Yes, It does if the SFP is Juniper original (or coded as original). This is from 10.0 and onwards, before that DOM doesn't exist on an EX. --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Jay Hanke jha...@myclearwave.net Till:'Chuck Anderson' c...@wpi.edu, juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10GE XFP

2009-12-15 Thread Martin Levin
On the MX, as of yet no incompatibilites. My problems have been with the EX... Twitchy thing that, and interestingly enough the fact that an XFP works in a EX3200 does not mean it will work in an EX4200... --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Jay Hanke jha

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10GE XFP

2009-12-14 Thread Martin Levin
functions might follow, who knows. This only applies to EX, in other Juniper products all things should work. --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net Till:Junaid junaid@gmail.com Kopia:Juniper-Nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Datum

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper 10GE XFP

2009-12-14 Thread Martin Levin
Oh, haven't seen that on our MX. Let's hope that is just incompatibilities, because that I have seen with different vendors. On some vendors DOM works and on others it doesn't (or gives strange values)... --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Johannes Resch j...@xor.at

Re: [j-nsp] Interest in a (european) Juniper User Group

2009-08-21 Thread Martin Levin
there that could be useful. Not to mention that theoretically the UG could act on behalf of all members in communication with Juniper. So, we (I) are intrested! --- Martin Levin IT-strategy planning Mölndals stad Från:Thomas Eichhorn t...@te3networks.de Till:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Datum:2009