t or less, and 3200
> is shared by all 4 PICs.
>
>
> On 2/23/13 6:51 PM, Matt Bentley wrote:
> > Thanks! So it would be correct to say you should NEVER see
> > oversubscription on a channelized DS3 card right? Obviously, you can
> > overdrive a single T1, but you'd n
the 1G
> per PIC limit).
>
> Summ...
>
> CFEB
> Up to 1Gbit per PIC, 3.2Gbit per bus _worst case small packet_
>
> E-CFEB
> Up to 1Gbit per PIC
>
>
> These figures are
> On 2/23/13 6:01 PM, Matt Bentley wrote:
> > OK - so there has been
OK - so there has been a lot of discussion around this that I've seen, but
I've searched for hours and still can't find concrete answers. Can someone
help?
1. Does the 3.2 Gbps throughput limitation include overhead? In other
words, Is the "raw" throughput 4 Gbps with effective throughput of 3.
*Hi Experts:*
*
*
*I've been reading the following doc, and am having a hard time figuring it
out.*
*
*
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos93/swconfig-cos/configuring-large-delay-buffers-for-slower-interfaces.html
*
*
*I have the following config on a channelized T3 (note that
q-pi
> On (2012-12-20 14:50 -0700), Matt Bentley wrote:
>
> > Thanks very much. I'd love to find that out. However, not able to find
> > the commands you reference. Is there a different set for 10.4R code?
> >
> > SSBR0(m10i-1 vty)# show cos ifl-entry 101
> &
1-pic Q based Channelized OC-3 pic information
qct3-pic Q-based Channelized T3 pic information
qge-pic QGE PIC information
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2012-12-20 14:03 -0700), Matt Bentley wrote:
>
> > least for
C.
Hopefully this makes sense.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2012-12-19 11:45 -0700), Matt Bentley wrote:
>
> > are smaller than what our allowable burst is. And, apparently, the
> ability
> > to set BC/BE on a Juniper shaper is a brand new feat
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Matt Bentley wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> We have a 200Mbps ethernet service delivered via EoSDH. We have GigE
>> handoffs to the carrier on either side. We've been seeing a chronic trace
>> amount of packet loss for some t
Hi All:
We have a 200Mbps ethernet service delivered via EoSDH. We have GigE
handoffs to the carrier on either side. We've been seeing a chronic trace
amount of packet loss for some time. After a lot of soul-searching, I
think we've identified that the inbound buffers on the carrier equipment
a
9 matches
Mail list logo
