Sigh...from everyone's answers it appears the short answer to this question
is no.
I guess I'll take this up with my account team.
Thanks everyone!
--
matt
On 7/2/09 12:25 PM, "Matt Stevens" wrote:
> Is there an easy way to add a new VLAN to multiple interfaces on t
Is there an easy way to add a new VLAN to multiple interfaces on the EX
series switches? I'd like to be able to use a port range for both adding
vlans to trunk ports and putting access ports into a specific vlan.
Both seem to only allow actions to be performed on a single port at a time.
--
matt
rvice-pic point of view.
So what is “input” for service-pic on any interface is actually “output”
for PFE on that interface and vice-versa.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Nilesh
On 1/28/09 10:44 AM, "Matt Stevens" wrote:
That's in the services ipsec-vpn rule:
puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matt Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:24 AM
To: Stefan Fouant
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Firewall filter on IPSec tunnel
These are next-hop ipsec sets. For example:
service-set ashburn2 {
er.net] On Behalf Of Matt Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:07 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Firewall filter on IPSec tunnel
Hello everyone.
I'm trying to apply a filter to traffic that's entering a router via an
IPSec tunnel. It doesn't seem like a
-gateway has been changed to protect the innocent...
--
matt
Stefan Fouant wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Matt Stevens <mailto:m...@elevate.org>> wrote:
Well, the fact that I'm terminating the tunnel helps. :-)
Basically, I want to apply an output filter on the tu
Well, the fact that I'm terminating the tunnel helps. :-)
Basically, I want to apply an output filter on the tunnel interface to
filter packets leaving the tunnel towards a local subnet.
--
matt
Stefan Fouant wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Matt Stevens <mailto:m...@ele
Hello everyone.
I'm trying to apply a filter to traffic that's entering a router via an
IPSec tunnel. It doesn't seem like applying the filter to the services
interfaces has any effect. I've thought about using the from interface
condition in the filter, but I have a fair number of IPSec inter
groups Groups from which to inherit configuration data
|Pipe through a command
[edit]
l...@sizzle-re0# show groups junos-defaults applications
Thanks,
Nilesh
On 1/23/09 2:04 PM, "Matt Stevens" wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to see the
Does anyone know if there's a way to see the configuration for the
"default" applications that are defined in JunOS? Ie. all the junos-XXX
applications.
I can't seem to find a show command that enumerates what exactly they match.
--
matt
___
juniper-n
Just wondering what everyone else is using for Compact Flash in the
J-Series.
I've been using the SanDisk SDCFB-1024-A10 1GB cards that are on the
Juniper compatibility list, but I've had at least two routers start
complaining about corruption on the flash.
I have one that's currently inacce
Hi,
I have a /32 that I'd like to redistribute via OSPF, the /32 is part of
a larger /24 that's directly connected to an interface of the router. I
don't want to advertise the whole /24 for various reasons, just the
route for the singe host.
Right now I have a static route:
static {
rou
That's sort of my issue as well. We have a couple of these cards being
used for telco connections in colos.
One seemed to work fine to a certain carrier, once we got them to enable
autonegotiation on their end.
Now we're trying to bring up another link, with a different carrier, and
running in
Is there anyone out there that can verify whether or not the 1-port SFP
ePIM for the J-Series supports manually configuring the speed/duplex
(disabling autonegotiation)?
Apparently the 6-port uPIM does not support this, and we're running
into issues getting an LX link up with a Cisco 6500. Pos
I'm trying to build a site-to-site IPSec tunnel with two J-4350's, but
I'm running into a strange issue.
The tunnel appears to be up, the two routers see each other as neighbors
in OSPF, I can even ping between the two routers.
In addition a host on one side can ping a host on the other side. T
tion static;
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> Don't forget to match on applications in the rule, if necessary, to
> activate ALGs.
>
> Now, you just add the new rule to the existing
I'm a recent Cisco convert - trying to wrap my head around the Juniper
was of dealing with NAT.
I'm trying to get a setup working where I can allow inbound traffic
through the NAT to specific internal machines.
Ideally I'd like to be able to map things at a port level - ie. port 80
on external
I'm dipping my toes into the Juniper pond for the first time - after
years of dealing with Cisco. I'm looking at using the J4350 as a border
router for some machines we have colo'd.
From reading the archives it looks like the 4350's use pretty standard
DRAM. But I can't find any mention of the
18 matches
Mail list logo