Hi Experts,
Currently I have following scenario.
SRX650 Cluster -> Nortel Router -> SRX240 (remote site)
The nortel router has E1 terminating from the remote SRX240 firewalls. The
objective is to remove the Nortel router from the network and terminate the
E1 directly on the primary SRX 650. For t
e schedulers "sch_30%-10ms-sh-tail"
priority strict-high
set groups cos class-of-service schedulers "sch_30%-15ms-lo-tail"
transmit-rate percent 30
set groups cos class-of-service schedulers "sch_30%-15ms-lo-tail"
buffer-size temporal 15k
set groups cos class-of-service
Hi Experts,
I am getting the following error while applying the CoS configuration.
[edit class-of-service interfaces]
'ge-1/0/2'
More than one scheduler is configured as "strict-high" or "high"
or "medium-high" in sch_mp-core for ge-1/0/2. Ifd ge-1/0/2 supports
only one scheduler with "str
Hi,
I was still seeing ping drops without using the size. I adjust the MTU
size back to 1950 on this router. I don't see ping drops now but the
BGP behavior is now the same again. It's stable with one of the RRs
and still flapping with the other RR.
regards,
Adnan.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:21 PM,
Dear Alexander,
I have found that the maximum PING size is 1870. If the value is 1871
I get a message "ping: sendto: Message too long". But at size 1870...I
am getting ping drops. The success rate is around 60%. Is it normal to
get ping drops? Anyways I have set the MTU to 1870+28=1898 and still
ob
pping was still there. Should I lower this further?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 01, 2011 05:19:24 PM Muhammad Adnan
> Mohsin wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexander & rest of the experts,
>> The MTU size in the whole network is set to 4492. But on
Hi Alexander & rest of the experts,
The MTU size in the whole network is set to 4492. But on this router
and the router connected to it, the MTU size recommended by the
transmission team is 2000. So it's configured 2000 on this router and
1950 is configured on the router that connects to it. Can so
Hi Experts,
I have a MX240 router installed at a remote location. I am able to
telnet/SSH the router but when I run a command that needs to return a
large output (e.g. show log messages or show conf) the session hangs
and then I have to re-establish the connection. Because of this I
couldn't provid
(Cease) subcode 6 (Other Configuration Change), Reason: Interface
change for the peer-group
Please help me understanding this Error Notification and what could be the
actual cause.
Warm Regards !
Muhammad Adnan
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
Hi guys ! I hve two STM-1 wid two different ISPs, now what i want to do is
to use both links equally. I m running BGP wid both ISP currently my router
is selecting best routes through BGP for outgoing and incoming traffic.
Regards !
___
juniper-nsp mail
10 matches
Mail list logo