Re: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS

2010-05-07 Thread Muhammad Farooq
Hi Paul, You will apply CoS/QoS configurations on AE interface not on AE members. Regards, Muhammad Farooq From: waller...@hotmail.com To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 14:58:29 +1000 Subject: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS Hi all, I can't find any

Re: [j-nsp] Aggregated Ethernet QoS

2010-05-07 Thread Muhammad Farooq
Please also find below link covering all required configurations for CoS/QoS in JUNOS. http://jnpr.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.1/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-cos/config-guide-cos-TOC.html Regards, Muhammad Farooq From: scorpian...@hotmail.com To: waller...@hotmail.com

[j-nsp] PBR JUNOS

2010-01-20 Thread Muhammad Farooq
Experts, I have a PBR question. Suppose I have a following firewall filter.. term 1 { from destination-port [http https] } then routing-instance test; term 2 { then accept;   routing-instance test { instance-type forwarding; { routing-option static route 0/0 next-hop 192.168.1.1/30 } } 

Re: [j-nsp] ISIS Case Study in JNCIP..Summarization into Backbone

2009-09-18 Thread Muhammad Farooq
Hi Hoogen, Your understanding is perfect. When requirement is to redistribute aggregate into backbone, then it is good, infact ideal practice to suppress more specific routes although it is explicitly not required. Regards, Farooq Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:16:16 -0700 From:

Re: [j-nsp] ATM config

2009-09-04 Thread Muhammad Farooq
Hi Clue, Your configurations for below mentioned requirement will be as follows in JUNOS. Suppose you have installed atm pic in fpc 0 pic slot 0. Configuration for Internet PVC at-0/0/0 { mtu 9192; encapsulation atm-pvc; atm-options { pic-type atm2;