Re: [j-nsp] load balancing in Route reflector scenario

2011-09-06 Thread P.Narayana Swamy
It seems add-path feature comes with hidden cli :) edit protocols bgp group add] core1@swamy# show  family inet {     unicast {         add-path {             send {                 path-count 6;             }         }     } } After enabling add-path, path-id is also advertised for the total #

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Hold time expiry

2008-09-22 Thread P.Narayana Swamy
Thank you all !!! Regards, Swamy --- On Sat, 9/20/08, Harry Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Harry Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [j-nsp] BGP Hold time expiry To: Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED], juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, September

[j-nsp] BGP Hold time expiry

2008-09-19 Thread P.Narayana Swamy
Hi, The EBGP session failed between Juniper and other vendor with the following log in Juniper Chassis. Juniper chassis sent the Hold timer expired Notification and ceased the session. Could you please let me know the reason for this Holdtime expiry? Were there any TCP session failure or any

[j-nsp] Juniper SDX-300 (interoperability with thrid party products like Cisco)

2008-04-18 Thread P.Narayana Swamy
Hi, Though, the SDX-300 supports COPS / BEEP sessions, It can support only JunosE and Junos ( Both ERX and M-series). Eventhough the controlling session is COPS, the Command line are different for other vendors. Swamy. Dear All I am currently evaluating Juniper SDX-300 software along with

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP flap between CRS-1 and junos 8.5 M40

2008-04-07 Thread P.Narayana Swamy
Sorry on that typo... It is 300 milliseconds. swamy. --- P.Narayana Swamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rupesh, Can you try changing VRRP Fast-interval to 300 seconds or more in M40 and check for the response. Also check the advertisement interval in CRS to match with M40. Regards

[j-nsp] RE- RT configuration for L2 VPN and L3 VPN

2007-09-27 Thread P.Narayana Swamy
Hi Monika, Each VRF needs a unique RT( Either L2 or L3 VPN ),since it imports the route based on the RT community. Regards, Swamy Should the route target be unique if a set of PEs provide both VPLS and L3 VPN services? To be more elaborate,