half or whatever.
--
Best regards,
Pajlatek mailto:pajla...@widzew.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Title: Re: [j-nsp] Load Balancing on 2x MSPIC 100 for NAT
The config that Artur proposed works great on M10i/M7i with 2xMSPIC + 1x ADV II PIC, without any problems or licenses.
Peter Okupski
--
Best regards,
Pajlatek mailto:pajla...@widzew.net
--
Best regards,
Pajlatek mailto:pajla...@widzew.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
official Juniper Carrier Grade Nat PDF has some holes,
which i will be investigating
further, but your setup makes it more simpler and i will test it
in next few days.
Peter
AM> On Thursday 12 of January 2012 21:50:14 Pajlatek wrote:
>> Hi
>> I am searching for any one tha
working at all.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/implementation-guides/8010076-en.pdf
Peter Okupski
--
Best regards,
Pajlatekmailto:pajla...@widzew.net
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Hi
on my M10i router i had the same problem, the problem is not in the DRAM , but
as mentioned before by Pekka Savola you have too big routing table which is
eating the SRAM.
This is only 8MB on M7i/M10i, and there is no upgrade.
To monitor your usage of SRAM use this command:
#request pfe execu
6 matches
Mail list logo