Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

environmentally hardened 10GE with a variety of options for uplink. q. — Quinn Snyder | snyd...@gmail.com -= Sent via iPad. Please excuse grammar, spelling, and brevity =- > On Jan 23, 2020, at 14:03, Colton Conor wrote: > > What is Cisco's upgrade path from the ASR920 if you need

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 capabilities question

t-50-bgp-routes-in-your-lab-network-download-this-vm-and-become-your-own-upstream-bgp-isp-for-testing/ q. -- quinn snyder | snyd...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] RE-S-X6-64G-BB

or future code on re. q. -- quinn snyder | snyd...@gmail.com -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Virtual route reflector physical layout

xrv 9000) with working data-plane. this platform comes in vpe and vrr provisioning variants (mostly based on ram and allocations of vcpu to data- and control-plane duties). there’s lot of nfv-centric presentations on the cisco live site. q. — quinn snyder | snyd...@gmail.com signature.asc Desc

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, quinn snyder wrote: >> all -- >> >> just a quick reachout. trying to dig through docs and either missing the >> boat or it doesn't exist. either way… >> >> i need to know if the srx240 supports the frame-relay standard t1.606. any

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013 at 2:05 PM, quinn snyder wrote: >> just to be clear -- t1.606 is not supported. are you referring to t1.602 and >> t1.607 as being supported? >> >> q. >> >> -= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =- >> >> On Sep 26, 201

[j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

all -- just a quick reachout. trying to dig through docs and either missing the boat or it doesn't exist. either way… i need to know if the srx240 supports the frame-relay standard t1.606. any pointers/links would be appreciated. thanks! q. -- quinn snyder snyd...@gmai

Re: [j-nsp] IRB Interface Question

isnt the bandwidth used as a metric placeholder for $routing_protocol? this is the significance in vendor 'c' land. q. -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =- On Sep 6, 2011, at 17:15, "Scott T. Cameron" wrote: > IRB is like RVI on Cisco. It's a logical interface,

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS scalability question.. OTV answer?

otv requires a unique vdc (virtual context) to run, plus the desired number of interfaces required to interconnect 'edge' with 'lan' contexts, as there is no backplane interconnect between contexts. oh, and vdc requires the advanced license (~$30k list). maximum number of vdc per n7k is 4, as the