Has anyone tried a *100g passive DAC* connection on the QFX10002 platform?
The compatibility list shows a 40g passive DAC is supported, but for 100g
an active DAC is needed.
Notes:
https://apps.juniper.net/hct/product/#prd=QFX10002
We are currently a mix of Juniper and Cisco. With the Cisco routers eBGP
peering with providers, exchanges, and customers.
We will be reintroducing Juniper as peering routers. While I have some old
Juniper BGP peering policies I can build from, I would like know what is
working, or not working,
Is anyone running the MX204 in a 2-post rack?
How is it holding up?
Spec sheet says it requires 4-post, which is a non-start in many of our
locations.
Thanks,
Rick
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
QFX10002 is Juniper silicon. Not Broadcom. Deep buffer support too.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/Bufs/QFX10002.html
The QFX5200 is Broadcom Tomahawk.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
> On 16/Apr/16 17:58, Richard Hicks wrote:
Thoughts on using the QFX10002 as a P only router?
WIll be our first big investment into Juniper hardware.
All PE functionally will live elsewhere. Mainly Cisco ASR9k and ASR1k for
now.
Thanks,
Rick
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
5 matches
Mail list logo