[j-nsp] QFX10002-36 100g Passive DAC support

2019-05-23 Thread Richard Hicks
Has anyone tried a *100g passive DAC* connection on the QFX10002 platform? The compatibility list shows a 40g passive DAC is supported, but for 100g an active DAC is needed. Notes: https://apps.juniper.net/hct/product/#prd=QFX10002

[j-nsp] BGP Peering Policies - Best Practices

2019-05-20 Thread Richard Hicks
We are currently a mix of Juniper and Cisco. With the Cisco routers eBGP peering with providers, exchanges, and customers. We will be reintroducing Juniper as peering routers. While I have some old Juniper BGP peering policies I can build from, I would like know what is working, or not working,

[j-nsp] MX204 in 2-post rack?

2019-03-15 Thread Richard Hicks
Is anyone running the MX204 in a 2-post rack? How is it holding up? Spec sheet says it requires 4-post, which is a non-start in many of our locations. Thanks, Rick ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] QFX10002 as P Router

2016-04-16 Thread Richard Hicks
QFX10002 is Juniper silicon. Not Broadcom. Deep buffer support too. http://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/Bufs/QFX10002.html The QFX5200 is Broadcom Tomahawk. On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 16/Apr/16 17:58, Richard Hicks wrote:

[j-nsp] QFX10002 as P Router

2016-04-16 Thread Richard Hicks
Thoughts on using the QFX10002 as a P only router? WIll be our first big investment into Juniper hardware. All PE functionally will live elsewhere. Mainly Cisco ASR9k and ASR1k for now. Thanks, Rick ___ juniper-nsp mailing list