[j-nsp] Share BGP routes over OSPF

Hi, We have the following setup. Router A speaks BGP with two ISP. Router B is in other geografic location, and doesn't speak bgp, only go to Internet througth NAT. We need to set a configuration that permit to share all the routes only of one ISP of router A inside Router B. To start, we creat

Re: [j-nsp] T4000 power architecture

ody wants to tell us? The response from JTAC so far has basically been hand-waving and avoiding the question. That doesn't give me much confidence in either the platform or JTAC. Cheers, Sam On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Fred Quan wrote: > Hi Sam, > > Maybe you can try the

Re: [j-nsp] T4000 power architecture

me find any clear photos of the rear of the PEM or the midplane :/ Sam On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Sam Silvester wrote: > Hi Aqeel - thanks for the reply. > > Agree 100% - the problem is, we only seem to be getting power to FPC0 from > one PEM... have a look below (and also note tha

Re: [j-nsp] T4000 power architecture

equests so far for a more detailed power architecture have been met with being sent that same (basic) document over and over; you'd think somebody, somewhere would have some more detailed insight into the power architecture of these beasts. Sam On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Tom Storey

Re: [j-nsp] T4000 power architecture

p://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information-products/topic-collections/hardware/t-series/t4000/hwguide/t4000-hwguide.pdf > > Regards > > > > On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:16 AM, Sam Silvester < > sam.silves...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

[j-nsp] T4000 power architecture

Howdy, Can anybody shed any light on how the PEMs on a T4000 actually distribute power to each FPC slot? Have the case of a single FPC slot that is showing power being received from only one of the PEMs, whilst all the other FPC slots are load sharing as expected. Replacing the FPC shows the sam

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 version

same for the number of ECMP paths. -- sam On 24 Jul 2013, at 15:07, Phil Bedard wrote: > This is unrelated somewhat, but what are the current LAG member limits > as well as ECMP limits? Any restrictions on LAG+ECMP? > > phil From: Sam > Sent: 7/24/2013 8:46 > To: Bouzem

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 version

n usage is scaled up by the number of ECMP next-hops. So 1 LSP with 4 > ECMP next-hops will take 1*8*4=32 tokens. -- sam On 24 Jul 2013, at 11:28, "Bouzemarene, Farid (ATS)" wrote: > Hello, > > Can you clarify the MPLS limits ? > > Thx > > - Message

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 version

I used the 12.3R2.5 for quite some time now without any issue. The platform has its limitations (especially related to how MPLS is handled), but if you're just using it for L2 or basic L3 it works just fine. -- sam On 24 Jul 2013, at 03:27, Luca Salvatore wrote: > Hi All, > &

Re: [j-nsp] EX series junos 12.x version

d, as I have all the > licences I need. We use third party optics as well and they work just fine. As for the licenses, I think the most you can get is warnings in your configuration/commit output. -- sam ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-ns

[j-nsp] Did anyone laready see this kind of logs on junose

Hi all, We have an E320 working as a LAC that began to logs several events like the following : ERROR 11/23/2009 11:54:08 aaaServerGeneral: interface description allocation failure, authentication and accounting attributes may not contain the correct information ERROR 11/23/2009 11:54:12 aaaServe

[j-nsp] L2TP with ERX as LAC and netscreen as LNS

Hi all, One of our customers would like to terminate it's employees sessions on its netscreen device and I would like your valuable advices and suggestions. We have ERX routers acting as LAC and I'm wondering if this setup was already implemented and if it's a viable solution. Are there any compa