Re: [j-nsp] PYEZ module hangs

Have you tried attaching a debugger and see where is hanging? santiago Sent from my iPhone > On 6 Nov 2018, at 01:48, serge vautour wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm having problems with the import of PYEZ module hanging. My python > script: > > from jnpr.junos import Device > def main(): > blah =

Re: [j-nsp] MX240+QFX5100 using Fusion - Any positive experience

Hi there, which MPC are you using. We have fusion edge on our lab with mx104 and no problem so far. We have a mx240 , if we have the same MPC I guess I can give it a try. Can you share your chassis config / show chassis satellite output / show interface ge-102/0/20 Santi Sent from my

Re: [j-nsp] MX 14.2R7 / PR1177571

n) disappeared as > soon as re1 (in newer version) took mastership in the chassis (non-GRES > switchover, as specified in JunOS updating documents). > > > >> Le 26 oct. 2016 à 15:19, Theo Voss <m...@theo-voss.de> a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Santiago, >

Re: [j-nsp] MX 14.2R7 / PR1177571

did the alarm disappeared after the 2nd RE was detected with the same software or after a complete reboot? Best regards, Theo *Von: *santiago martinez <santiago.martinez...@gmail.com> *Datum: *Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2016 um 15:15 *An: *Theo Voss <m...@theo-voss.de> *Cc: *"juniper-

Re: [j-nsp] MX 14.2R7 / PR1177571

Hi there, yes we did hit the same PR. the alarm was raised during the upgrade and completely disappear after both RE. were running the same code version (14.2R6). Regards santiago On 26 Oct 2016 12:00, "Theo Voss" wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > thanks for your reply. Yes, /var

Re: [j-nsp] ACX50xx l2circuit counters

Hi Saku, I agree having a small db with features limitations and scalability will be great and saves us lot of headache. regards santi > On 20 Jun 2016, at 10:12, Saku Ytti wrote: > > I'm not pointing at JNPR, other vendors do it too. But these > cheap/dense boxes have tons of

Re: [j-nsp] SRX and MX Security

Hi, there is no Inter chassis ha for the MX series with MS-cards . Also the number of supported IPSEC tunnel and tunnels per second is really low/bad. the pps is not as bad as the session but is nothing similar to what huawe or alcatel can do. regards santi Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Dec

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper vMX limitations

Hi, i've seen both KVM and VMWARE version running last week. Kvm version was sometimes crashing during boot process while the vmware was really stable. Regards Santiago Sent from my iPhone On 29 Jul 2015, at 21:52, Raphael Mazelier r...@futomaki.net wrote: Le 29/07/15 22:13, Josh

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 IPSEC VPN

Hi, depending on the packet size the mx will provide with higher throughput than the low/med range SRXs Regards Santiago Sent from my iPhone On 29 Apr 2015, at 13:27, Asad Raza asadgard...@gmail.com wrote: I doubt if MX80 has more capacity interms of ipsec performance. What numbers are

Re: [j-nsp] Dear Juniper...

Sorry for my bad english. The site is fucking bad, useless, not even mentioning sub sites like the uk one that are pointing to un existing pages. I spent 20 minutes writing a feedback regarding the useless and crap quality of the site and the email was rejected by juniper server. With all the

[j-nsp] MS-MPC and MS-MIC.

Hi all, I'm working on a project where we need to encrypt a couple of gigs of traffic.Packet size will be around 104bytes. We don't want to use firewall hardware like SRX any other firewall vendors. Does somebody have a table with the MS-MPC and MS-MIC figures showing the throughput with

[j-nsp] Juniper ex9200

Hi guys, Just wondering if anyone out there is already using the ex9200 switches. Im interested on knowing about stability in virtual chassis mode. Also, does anyone have idea about the bw per slot with the new SF2? Thanks in advance. Have a great weekend. Santiago

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper ex9200

it comes to dhcp-relay or you have mtu configuration for jumbo frames on any interface. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2014, at 7:25 PM, Santiago Martinez santiago.martinez...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Just wondering if anyone out there is already using the ex9200 switches. Im

Re: [j-nsp] MX480 RE-S-2000 IGMP flood

Hi Saku, agree with you, LPTS is doing a better job right now... If I'm not wrong or miss interpreting Juniper documentation, Junos ddos aready support per flow ddos (12.3 and later) Best regards Santiago url:

Re: [j-nsp] Anybody use dual RE in srx3k? SCM only?

Hi, the SCM will only allow you to use a secondary control link on the srx3600. Juniper sales ing said that they are not planning to add support for a second RE on the srx3000 family. if you don't have the SCM the second control port will be/stay disable. Hope it helps Santiago. On 16 Dec