Re: [j-nsp] Strange Errormessage - jtag0 incorrect pn, 0x2400

Sounds like a hardware failure or a counterfeit board if that exists for Juniper. -Scott -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joerg Staedele Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:41 PM To: juniper-nsp@

Re: [j-nsp] telnet access

Correct. This is a little different than how you think of security in Cisco ACL's, but think of it as that any services that run on the router itself enter the router's management IP stack on lo0. The folks over at CYRMU have some nice docs on Juniper security such as: http://www.cymru.com/gillsr

[j-nsp] MLPPP Between JunOS and IOS Cisco Routers

Does anyone have a set of standard working configurations for MLPPP between JunOS and Cisco IOS routers, specifically fragmentation settings for use with a mix of data and voice (including fax) traffic? We are using JunOS 8.X on an M20, and various Cisco devices and codes including IAD2400's, 2

Re: [j-nsp] PIC Based Active Monitoring/Sampling (Netflow export) on JunOS 9.6

alf Of Scott Berkman Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:56 PM To: 'Nilesh Khambal'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PIC Based Active Monitoring/Sampling (Netflow export) on JunOS 9.6 Yes NTP is configured and active (has been for some time): > show ntp status statu

Re: [j-nsp] PIC Based Active Monitoring/Sampling (Netflow export) on JunOS 9.6

riginal Message- From: Nilesh Khambal [mailto:nkham...@juniper.net] Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:51 PM To: Scott Berkman; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] PIC Based Active Monitoring/Sampling (Netflow export) on JunOS 9.6 Have you configured NTP server on the router? If n

[j-nsp] PIC Based Active Monitoring/Sampling (Netflow export) on JunOS 9.6

All, I am trying to configure active flow monitoring similar to the following link with an AS PIC on an M160 running 9.6: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos95/feature-guide/id-1137 6518.html I have checked all of the 9.6 documents such as this: http://www.juniper.net/

Re: [j-nsp] RED Drops with Qos

allowing for transient bursts. Under the chassis/pic hierarchy you must enable weighted-average RED and you should put a weight of 9 as a start. From: Scott Berkman To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Mon, December 21, 2009 3:11:40 PM Subject: [j-nsp] RED

Re: [j-nsp] RED Drops with Qos

ent bursts. Under the chassis/pic hierarchy you must enable weighted-average RED and you should put a weight of 9 as a start. ____ From: Scott Berkman To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Mon, December 21, 2009 3:11:40 PM Subject: [j-nsp] RED Drops with Q

[j-nsp] RED Drops with Qos

Hi All, I'm fairly new to Juniper, and I am trying to get our QoS setup right on a M20 running JunOS 8.3 being used for T1 aggregation. The PIC is an IQ-enabled ChOC12 card, and the interfaces are channelized T1's. We seem to be classifying traffic into the