I've had no qualms in the past using the Juniper SIP ALG, which
surprised me given how bad every other vendor's is, even with Cisco Java
based handsets (which are painful at best). You do need to disable it
for TCP, though.
Craig Askings mailto:caski...@ionetworks.com.au
14 March 2014 8:29
Hi Guys,
I'm currently trying to figure out how I can deploy either PLVAN or some kind
of local ethernet isolation on my network.
I currently have a bunch of customers on /30 interconnects which are trunked
back to our EX4200 for aggregation. I'd like to somehow shift those customers
into a
Hi Chris,
Just a hunch but I suspect the FIB on your EX4200 is full (I seem to recall the
EX can only hold 16K routes), which is probably causing all kinds of weirdness:
inet.0: 16384 destinations, 16384 routes (16384 active, 0 holddown, 0
You probably want to filter your routes down to what
I don't suppose this trick works on the SRX as well? *grin*
-Shane
On 21/07/2010, at 2:54 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
I thought that as soon as you turn MPLS on the flow mode was diabled and you
were back to good old packet mode?
--
Leigh
-Original Message-
From:
It's the answer to the universe!
*faints*
On 04/06/2010, at 11:08 AM, Tommy Perniciaro wrote:
7
Sent from my iPhone
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
I think the BGP licensing for JunOS is quite ridiculous..
I've been looking at upgrading our small network to some J series routers and
simply haven't, because as you said-- the price of the license is almost as
much as the unit itself. what gives?
-Shane
On 18/02/2010, at 11:28 PM, Tore
That would explain it-- my very shallow depth of Juniper knowledge started on
the EX series :)
-Shane
On 19/02/2010, at 2:54 AM, Patrik Olsson wrote:
No BGP license of J series right? Only on EX?
I think route reflector demands license on Jseries!
Patrik
Shane Short wrote:
I think
I don't know about anyone else, but I'd really appreciate it, if every post you
posted wasn't 'urgent'.
We're not here to serve you.
-Shane
On 22/12/2009, at 10:17 PM, chandrasekaran iyer wrote:
Hi,
I have following topology
ospf
You'll find that 9.2Gbps was the 5minute average-- you were probably
bursting well above that frequently, hence the drops.
There was a massive discussion about this on the nanog list, depending
on the type traffic your transiting, you shouldn't run your link at
hotter than 70-90%
Time
On 27/09/2009, at 4:18 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 02:52:34PM +0800, Shane Short wrote:
You'll find that 9.2Gbps was the 5minute average-- you were probably
bursting well above that frequently, hence the drops.
There was a massive discussion about
10 matches
Mail list logo
