Re: [j-nsp] Why is this term working?

JFYI.. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.1/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-policy/topic-28284.html The nonterminating action operations carry a default accept action //BR -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS and 128.0.0.0 martian (JFYI)

So with 128/16 going live, Juniper may also additionally need to change their internal addressing! re0 show interfaces em1 terse Interface Admin Link ProtoLocal Remote em1 upup em1.0 upup inet

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS and 128.0.0.0 martian (JFYI)

, 2011 10:19 PM To: Tarique A. Nalkhande - BMC; 'Daniel Roesen'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] JUNOS and 128.0.0.0 martian (JFYI) Pardon me for asking this... But those routes are in private tables... does this really mean that Juniper is going to block the traffic when it doesn't

Re: [j-nsp] Filter-based forwarding on egress - limitations on the MX?

Clarke, If I understood your query correctly, IMHO you would also want to explore the option of putting this FBF filter under PFE itself (forwarding-option). --- sample output --- MX-960 show configuration forwarding-options family inet filter input

Re: [j-nsp] Paid: need small M7i config snippet (policer)

Markus, The percentage of UDP traffic can vary from less than 5 percent to more than 50 percent of network traffic. After establishing a baseline, you can decide if it is necessary to rate-limit UDP to preserve bandwidth for other protocols. For establishing the above baseline, counters

Re: [j-nsp] Max. Bgp routes for M10i RE-850 1536MB

AFAIK, RIB capacity (IPv4) for RE-850-1536 is ~6M. Thanks Regards Tarique Abbas Nalkhande -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Serrano Samaca, Edinson (EXT-Other - MX/Mexico City) Sent: 07 April, 2011

Re: [j-nsp] fpc fails to load after an upgrade of MX

We had a similar issue after a RE reboot, basically the PFE doesn't re-initialize clean after the reset. Try this FPC in a different slot to see if it comes up simultaneously a spare (Working) FPC in slot 2. Based on the outcome you can then request a RMA. Thanks Regards Tarique Abbas

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP polling issue MX

All, Even we faced a similar problem on our MX's running 10.2R3. Further findings revealed memory leak bug for mib2d process.. restarting mib2d fixed it. Juniper is probably tracking it through some internal PR, the committed release is 10.2R3 which doesn't look likely. Thanks Regards

Re: [j-nsp] One or more stream blocked

Ross, As aware, in the MX DPC there is a chip called the IChip (this is where all the data forwarding take place). Earlier there were some cases where IChip was dropping the packets. To recover the chip from the 'wedge' state Juniper implemented a self-healing mechanism as a response to PR

Re: [j-nsp] Vlan Rewrite - Non IQ PICs (MX)

TCC is the way to go.. TCC is supported in CCC, draft-Kompella, and draft-Martini based VPNs to allow for interworking between dissimilar access technologies (or differing VLAN IDs, which are normally required to be the same at both ends of a L2 VPN). Feel free to unicast, if you need