Re: [j-nsp] MX80 upgrade caveats

Hi, MX80 11.4R11 -> 13.3R5 jump was at least smooth. Other than that inline-jflow PFE memleak :) Cheers, Toni On 07-May-15 23:40, COOK, MYLES wrote: There were enough difference between 11.x and 12.x that you had to move to at least one version of 12.x before moving past. Once you are on t

Re: [j-nsp] Junos MX series and Andrisoft Flow tools

Hi, On 25-Jan-15 23:34, John Brown wrote: I'm looking for advise on configuring our MX480 (Junos 12.3R4.6) to support IPFIX flows for Andrisoft's WanGuard flow based tools. They only have samples for M series and that C company. Coming back to this old thread. I've been evaluating Andrisoft's

Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow forwarding convergence

Hi, On 14.8.2014 16:01, Clarke Morledge wrote: Do you happen to know the PR number on the full routing table and netflow issue? I am doing inline-jflow, so perhaps that may have something to do with it. PR963060 Resolved in 12.2R9 12.3R5-S4 12.3R7 13.1R5 13.2R5 13.3R3 14.1R1 Though I hear the

Re: [j-nsp] TASK_OS_MEMHIGH on ex2200

leak has been fixed in later 10.4 and 11.1 releases. I have personally killed the vcpp-task from the shell and JunOS just restarts the process. There is no ill effect at least what i could observe when I last did that. Best Regards, Toni Mattila

Re: [j-nsp] Secure tunnelling between packet-mode operation routers

Hi, On 14.1.2011 13:10, Dave Barton wrote: We have no firewalling or security requirements for the tunnel, we just need a dumb pipe for routing traffic and running OSPF. Can anyone offer any tips or alternative suggestions for how this could be done? With 10.2 and 10.3 you can do both packet m

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 filter buggy?

Hi, On 15.12.2010 16:16, Charlie Allom wrote: I am waiting for it to calm down again, do you think splitting the term into a TCP and UDP version will help? Personally I have noticed that destination/source-address works better in EX-series than prefix lists.. maybe that's something to try.