Bruno
-- Original --
From: "Bikram Singh";
Date: Sun, Jan 27, 2013 03:52 PM
To: "bruno.juniper";
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] using lt interface connecting logical-system problem
try e
rds,
Bruno
-- Original --
From: "Bikram Singh";
Date: Sun, Jan 27, 2013 03:52 PM
To: "bruno.juniper";
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] using lt interface connecting logical-system pr
Bruno
-- Original --
From: "Scott Martin";
Date: Sun, Jan 27, 2013 11:26 AM
To: "bruno.juniper";
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] using lt interface connecting logical-system problem
Please see:
https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_
when i configure like this ,it work. but can't find any doc in juniper ? is
this a bug or hardware different ?
logical-systems {
R1 {
interfaces {
lt-1/2/0 {
unit 0;
}
}
}
R2 {
interfaces {
Hi ALL,
I am using lt interface to connect logical-system on my M7i. configure lt
interface under logical-system. it didn't work.
it test it on 12.1,10.4R9.2. I find all the Juniper doc is configure like this
.
[edit]
root@LAB# show logical-systems
R1 {
interfaces {
hi experts,
I am testing multicast using mx80 box with logical routers.the topology is like
this:
R6-S1--R1-R3-R8-Rec1.
R1 and R3 run pim-sm mode .R1 is RP.
when i use ping to to test ,it got response from R1 not Receiver-r8.then i go
to r3 to check pim join .found out only rpt,not
I have bought JCos workbook from Juniper onfulfillment website. it's great
book. Is there anyone have inital config or complete config base on Juniper
virtual lab.I really need it.
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
___
juniper-nsp mailing list ju
what is differnet between bridge and ethernet-switching ? i am always
confused . as i know ,when i configure mx ,we use bridge . when i configure ex
,we use ethernet-switching.
root@test# set interfaces fe-0/0/0 unit 0 family ?
Possible completions:
+ apply-groups Groups from
Hello guys,
I am testing LDP and BGP VPLS interconnecting, the topology is below
CE1-(PE1-P4-PE2-P5--PE3)---CE3
All the router run OSPFand LDP in the core.PE1\P4\PE2 in default BGP mesh
group,PE2\P5\PE3 in another mesh group. ALL the VPLS status is ok. BUT CEs
can??t
"Juniper Maillist";
Cc: "bruno.juniper";
"juniper-nsp";
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] looking for jncie-sp study follow
On 4/24/2012 8:42 PM, Juniper Maillist wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> Do you recommend taking the bootcamp just before entering the exam (1 week
>
-
From: "Stefan Fouant";
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 10:57 PM
To: "bruno.juniper";
Cc: "juniper-nsp";
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] looking for jncie-sp study follow
On 4/23/2012 11:26 PM, bruno.juniper wrote:
> Looking for study folks; My exam is in 2 moths.skype: bruno
Looking for study folks; My exam is in 2 moths.skype: brunojuniper
--
Best Regards,
Bruno
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--- Original --
From: "Palmentieri, Nunzia (NSN - IT/Rome)";
Date: Mon, Apr 23, 2012 04:17 PM
To: "ext bruno.juniper";
"juniper-nsp";
Subject: R: [j-nsp] vpls multihome link agg test
hi,
why lacp passive?
____
17 PM
To: "ext bruno.juniper";
"juniper-nsp";
Subject: R: [j-nsp] vpls multihome link agg test
hi,
why lacp passive?
Da: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net per conto di ext bruno.juniper
Inviato: dom 22/04/2012 9.11
A: juniper-nsp
O
hi experts,
i am using srx test link aggregation to prevent loops as well as provide added
bandwidth between PE and CE in vpls.
the agg can't success. config is below. i hope my config is wrong . i have
check many times.
PE(SRX210)===CE(3750)
fe-0/0/5 {
vlan-tagging;
encapsulation
15 matches
Mail list logo
