Re: [j-nsp] Difference in "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"?

On 10/01/2024 22:41, Richard McGovern wrote: Hopefully this helps, and explains a little of the history of how MX got to where it is today, and beyond. Thanks for the insight! this helps :) As I only need it for spare I will probably just go for the MX204-HW-BASE and ignore the warning

Re: [j-nsp] Difference in "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"?

On 10/01/2024 18:50, Richard McGovern wrote: So basically without some Feature License tied the HW SN via some Flex Feature License, it is a good boat anchor! So why does the MX204 I currently have and doesn't have any license installed on it is running BGP/OSPF without any problems on version

[j-nsp] Difference in "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"?

Is there a difference between "MX204" and "MX204-HW-BASE"? I thought the "MX204" has honored based license, which isn't sold anymore. Where the "MX204-HW-BASE" (also end of sale but still widely available) enforces the license after version 22.2R1 for BGP. Is this assumption correct? If