Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

2020-01-23 Thread quinn snyder
environmentally hardened 10GE with a variety of options for uplink. q. — Quinn Snyder | snyd...@gmail.com -= Sent via iPad. Please excuse grammar, spelling, and brevity =- > On Jan 23, 2020, at 14:03, Colton Conor wrote: > > What is Cisco's upgrade path from the ASR920 if you need more

Re: [j-nsp] RE-S-X6-64G-BB

2016-05-21 Thread quinn snyder
ossibility for future code on re. q. -- quinn snyder | snyd...@gmail.com -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =- ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread quinn snyder
at 2:05 PM, quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com wrote: just to be clear -- t1.606 is not supported. are you referring to t1.602 and t1.607 as being supported? q. -= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =- On Sep 26, 2013, at 13:18, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread quinn snyder
, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM, quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com wrote: all -- just a quick reachout. trying to dig through docs and either missing the boat or it doesn't exist. either way… i need to know if the srx240 supports the frame-relay standard t1.606. any pointers/links would

[j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-25 Thread quinn snyder
all -- just a quick reachout. trying to dig through docs and either missing the boat or it doesn't exist. either way… i need to know if the srx240 supports the frame-relay standard t1.606. any pointers/links would be appreciated. thanks! q. -- quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com

Re: [j-nsp] IRB Interface Question

2011-09-06 Thread quinn snyder
isnt the bandwidth used as a metric placeholder for $routing_protocol? this is the significance in vendor 'c' land. q. -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =- On Sep 6, 2011, at 17:15, Scott T. Cameron routeh...@gmail.com wrote: IRB is like RVI on Cisco. It's a

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS scalability question.. OTV answer?

2011-03-27 Thread Quinn Snyder
otv requires a unique vdc (virtual context) to run, plus the desired number of interfaces required to interconnect 'edge' with 'lan' contexts, as there is no backplane interconnect between contexts. oh, and vdc requires the advanced license (~$30k list). maximum number of vdc per n7k is 4, as