ginal Message-
> From: Chris Burton [mailto:chris.bur...@speakeasy.net]
> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2017 6:37 AM
> To: adamv0...@netconsultings.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] LACP between router VMs (James Bensley)
>
> For better or worse I d
Amazon recently announced bare metal instances which provide access to
the CPU virtual instruction set such as Intel VT-x, so although I
haven't had a chance to look into it much just yet, I'm hoping one can
spin up vMX/ASR9Kv etc. using these instances in Amazon and just
offload the scaling issue
For better or worse I do remember those days, though I was referring to
recent hardware switches/bridges (should have clarified that). To my
knowledge that only applies to things like the STP protocols, but I
could be wrong, again would need to read through the specifications
again to be sure
Hey,
> local link and not forwarded by the soft bridge by default (I do not know of
> any hardware bridges that allow you to disabled this restriction, if you know
> of any I would be interested.
>
My understanding is that Carrier-Ethernet grade switches/routers should allow
you to
❦ 1 décembre 2017 21:43 -0800, Chris Burton :
> LACP and LLDP (and the like) are link local only protocols (would need
> to dig through the specifications to find the exact rules), they
> should not be forwarded by the bridge
802.1Q-2005, 8.6.3 and 8.13.4. However,
Glad the conversation helped. The note about the scripts was a general
FYI in case there are others looking to use the scripts as there have
been many conversations about the use of LLDP and LACP with the vMX in
the past, both on this thread as well as other chats, forums, etc...
just
> Chris Burton
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 11:50 PM
>
> This has been discussed a few times on this list and other forums. That being
> said, if you are looking to do this with Linux bridge you will need to modify
> the net/br_private.h header library to remove the mask restriction placed
iper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] LACP between router VMs
Message-ID:
@puck.nether.net" <cisco-...@puck.nether.net>,
> juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] LACP between router VMs
> Message-ID:
>
On 8 November 2017 at 16:30, Jeff Meyers wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> LACP packets (so called slow packets in the linux kernel) are never
> forwarded by the bridging code. If it didn't change in the last ~2 years,
> you will have to hack your kernel in order to let them pass. It's
Hi Adam,
LACP packets (so called slow packets in the linux kernel) are never
forwarded by the bridging code. If it didn't change in the last ~2
years, you will have to hack your kernel in order to let them pass. It's
actually only a minor change in a couple of lines. The same applies btw
to
11 matches
Mail list logo