Re: [j-nsp] ACX2200 - bandwidth control at subinterfaces

2016-08-27 Thread Jason Healy
On Aug 25, 2016, at 10:22 PM, Chris Kawchuk wrote: > > I think you can still shape per-queue (i.e. [edit class-of-service > schedulers] best-effort shaping-rate XX;); so, using some output firewall > filters, you can put different VLANs into different queues, and shape

Re: [j-nsp] ACX2200 - bandwidth control at subinterfaces

2016-08-25 Thread Chris Kawchuk
You mean scheduler maps/shaping on a subinterface? Correct. EX doesn't do per-unit schedulers. If they did, nobody would buy an MX for HQoS. ;) You can do hard policers though... which is nasty. I think you can still shape per-queue (i.e. [edit class-of-service schedulers] best-effort

[j-nsp] ACX2200 - bandwidth control at subinterfaces

2016-08-24 Thread Alexandre Guimaraes
Gents, afternoon, After some research and a talk with my SE about how to control bandwidth at subinterfaces using ACX2200 Access Routers. I´h reached a point where we can´t control bandwidth using subinterfaces. Had someone of you guys, find a way to control that?