Recent JunOS (13.3R4 - 13.3.R5)[0] have interpretation of RFC7300
where you should drop prefixes if AS65535 occurs in your ASPATH.
I'm first to admit that we've done terrible mistake years ago by
choosing 65535 as CE ASN,
---
While Last ASNs are reserved, they remain valid ASNs from a BGP
On (2015-03-16 13:52 -0400), Jeff Haas wrote:
Hey Jeff,
PR 1069307 covers the fix for those branches to restore AS 65535 to use.
Thanks. I'll work through our account team, in attempt to get 14.2R3 beta or
other release with fix integrated. Bit of in hurry, as we somehow missed this
in systest
I'm first to admit that we've done terrible mistake years ago by
choosing 65535 as CE ASN,
[...]
But considering that in my biases I'm reading this wrong. It seems it
would still be fundamentally against robustness principles to drop
these prefixes.
I think vendors would benefit on
3 matches
Mail list logo
