Re: [j-nsp] BFD between Cisco - Juniper when FRR is enabled does not torn down primary tunnel

Hi David, we were using both version 9.2 and 9.4 with mpls oam feature, but as fas as I know Cisco does not support this functionality. For testing BFD we teared down logical interface, so the meaning of BFD actually come in place (physical port stayed up). On Cisco side I saw that BFD actually t

Re: [j-nsp] BFD between Cisco - Juniper when FRR is enabled does not torn down primary tunnel

How long does it take for your FRR to kick in? Is your logical or physical link actually down (you mention both below) ? I imagine if you want BFD-speed failover, you may want to look at 9.4, which apparently supports BFD for LDP and RSVP sessions. David On 03/04/2009, Robert Kern wrote: >

[j-nsp] BFD between Cisco - Juniper when FRR is enabled does not torn down primary tunnel

Hi all, we have run into a problem with BFD between Cisco and Juniper box when MPLS-FRR is configured. ISIS is used as IGP protocol and one hop MPLS-TE tunnels are configured with link protection. BFD is configured on both sides (under IS-IS protocol). After primary logical link is dropped betwee