On Friday, March 04, 2011 06:27:27 am Doug Hanks wrote:
> We generally recommend 150ms to most customers. The
> added benefit of going from 150ms to 50ms is generally
> not enough to warrant the move.
We've been using 250ms with multipliers of 3 on short runs
and 5 on longer ones. Has been stab
2011 10:07 AM
> To: David Ball
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BFD timers for OSPF - MX80 - 10.3R2.11
>
> We are using bfd on mx80 with 300ms timers and no problems. Only 2 or 3
> sessions per box however.
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> An
, March 03, 2011 10:07 AM
To: David Ball
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BFD timers for OSPF - MX80 - 10.3R2.11
We are using bfd on mx80 with 300ms timers and no problems. Only 2 or 3
sessions per box however.
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 0870
We are using bfd on mx80 with 300ms timers and no problems. Only 2 or 3
sessions per box however.
--
Regards
Andy Harding
Internet Connections Ltd
Phone: 0870 803 1868
Mobile: 07813 975459
Fax: 0870 803 1781
Web: www.inetc.co.uk
Email: a...@inetc.co.uk
On 3 Mar 2011, at 17:53, David Ball wr
Probably yes, however, RFC 5880 states:
---
protocol intended to detect faults in the bidirectional path between
two forwarding engines, including interfaces, data link(s), and to the
extent possible the forwarding engines themselves, with potentially
very low latency. It operates independently of
On (2011-03-03 20:42 +0300), Egor Zimin wrote:
Hi,
> It looks like BFD implementation in MX80 is not distributed. At this
> moment I have a case in JTAC. The case is opened yet, however, it
> _looks_like_ bfd is not distributed.
If it would be 'distributed', wouldn't it run in 'linecard excepti
Ah, that might help explain it. And shame on me for not checking
'sh pfe statistics traffic protocol bfd', which of course shows none
received or absorbed.
I'll only have 2 sessions on each MX80, so I think I might leave it
enabled, but may toy with the interval. I'm expecting the control
pla
Hello, David
It looks like BFD implementation in MX80 is not distributed. At this
moment I have a case in JTAC. The case is opened yet, however, it
_looks_like_ bfd is not distributed.
Probably because of this BFD echomode is not supported. And using 30ms
timers for BFD ControlPackets can be not s
MX80s running 10.3R2.11
For those of you using BFD for OSPF, how low have you been able to
set your minimum-interval timer? I have a pair of MX80s connected via
XFPs and 1m patch cables and with my hellos set to 30ms and multiplier
set to 3, I'm seeing failures. I haven't disabled distributed
9 matches
Mail list logo
