On (2013-11-30 22:25 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote:
troubleshooting done by getting my peer to send me an e-mail with what
they are sending to me.
Well you have the luxury of working with skilled operators.
Once I had this inter-as-mpls-opt-A project migrating customers between two
providers.
On Monday, December 02, 2013 10:56:25 AM Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
Well you have the luxury of working with skilled
operators.
No, not always.
Saying what you're sending on the phone is questionable.
Having it displayed in e-mail is more helpful, especially if
you can help the other end with
On (2013-11-29 10:15 -0800), Bill Blackford wrote:
I hope this is not too off topic, but it may be worth mentioning here that
the EX series (2200-4500) will only receive (routes received) a random
subset of a full BGP table. If it's your plan to receive a full table then
filter upon that, you
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 01:06:40 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
JunOS works by default like IOS with
'soft-reconfiguration inbound'. I.e. all routes you've
received are stored, filtered or not.
Well, to be pedantic, soft-reconfiguration inbound - which
I wonder why I still see a lot of in the
On (2013-11-30 21:30 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote:
Well, to be pedantic, soft-reconfiguration inbound - which
I wonder why I still see a lot of in the 21st century even
from large global providers - creates a second, unedited RIB
of the BGP table.
I'm not sure the idealized BGP design from
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 10:09:23 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
I'm not sure the idealized BGP design from RFC translates
this directly to any particular implementation.
This is specific to IOS, and by extension, IOS XE.
I've never been sure whether Juniper's show route receive-
protocol bgp
On (2013-11-30 22:25 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote:
troubleshooting done by getting my peer to send me an e-mail
with what they are sending to me.
And soft-reconfig avoids this step, saving time.
--
++ytti
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 10:33:13 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
And soft-reconfig avoids this step, saving time.
In the majority of cases, you're still going to call your
peer after checking the SR-RIB (my own creation) anyway.
I see your view point, don't get me wrong. But for the
memory hit,
On 11/30/2013 ?? 12:45, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net
mailto:t...@snnap.net wrote:
Interesting. Has anyone tried this with protocols like IS-IS and
with IPv6?
I'd love to add an EX3200 to my lab, but shelling out for a
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote:
Interesting. Has anyone tried this with protocols like IS-IS and with IPv6?
I'd love to add an EX3200 to my lab, but shelling out for a license would
make it a bit too expensive.
I've used EX4200 with IS-IS and IPv6 and would
On Friday, November 29, 2013 05:45:52 PM Paul S. wrote:
That still has not changed as of 12.3R3.4. It's been that
way for quite a few revisions now.
Same situation on the EX4550 as well.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I hope this is not too off topic, but it may be worth mentioning here that
the EX series (2200-4500) will only receive (routes received) a random
subset of a full BGP table. If it's your plan to receive a full table then
filter upon that, you won't be filtering against full routes. I learned
that
Interesting. Has anyone tried this with protocols like IS-IS and with IPv6?
I'd love to add an EX3200 to my lab, but shelling out for a license would
make it a bit too expensive.
On 27 Nov 2013 00:25, Paul S. cont...@winterei.se wrote:
From what I've seen, the license is mainly a 'nag license,'
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 02:11:07 AM Tom Storey wrote:
Interesting. Has anyone tried this with protocols like
IS-IS and with IPv6? I'd love to add an EX3200 to my
lab, but shelling out for a license would make it a bit
too expensive.
IS-IS will work, but will spew out errors about lack
The datasheet is conveniently vague here, Do any know whether these two
support BGP? and how much instances/peers can they support? Also, do they
have wire routing capability (suspiciously missing from data sheet too)
BTW: Why is it so hard to get a cheap decent l3 switch? EX2200-C looks
To quote:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e63
Yes, I agree it is vague. I'd like more information about the amount if
Layer 3 interfaces (RVI/SVI), Static routing, etc... which, the theory if
it can do OSFP, then should be
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:19:30PM -0800, Yucong Sun wrote:
The datasheet is conveniently vague here, Do any know whether these two
support BGP? and how much instances/peers can they support? Also, do they
have wire routing capability (suspiciously missing from data sheet too)
No, no BGP on
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 08:52:51AM +1100, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
To quote:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html#jd0e63
Yes, I agree it is vague. I'd like more information about the amount if
Layer 3 interfaces (RVI/SVI), Static
Awesome Doug ;-)
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau
linkedin.com/in/skeeve
Thanks for the link, what about EX3200 ? EX3200 doesn't need AFL for l3
features?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Skeeve Stevens
skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote:
To quote:
specifically, for BGP and wire-speed ip routing, at least that's how i
intereprt the datasheet.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Yucong Sun sunyuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the link, what about EX3200 ? EX3200 doesn't need AFL for l3
features?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Skeeve
nvm , looks like it still does:, quoting the software license bit.
Sigh!
To use the following features on EX3200, EX4200, EX4500, EX4550, EX8200,
and EX9200 switches, you must install an advanced feature license (AFL):
- Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and multiprotocol BGP (MBGP)
-
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:43:18PM -0800, Yucong Sun wrote:
Thanks for the link, what about EX3200 ? EX3200 doesn't need AFL for l3
features?
Anything EX can do routed L3, but if you want BGP, you're going to be
buying a license (and for some reason, OSPFv3 on some platforms is a
license, where
From what I've seen, the license is mainly a 'nag license,' at least
for BGP.
I've got quite a few customers doing BGP on the aforementioned products
without the AFL, all it appears to affect is that it whines every single
time a commit is performed -- yet continues to function fine.
This
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:29AM +0900, Paul S. wrote:
From what I've seen, the license is mainly a 'nag license,' at least
for BGP.
I've got quite a few customers doing BGP on the aforementioned products
without the AFL, all it appears to affect is that it whines every single
time a
Doug,
Well yeah. I forgot to mention that the 2200 doesn't even have it available.
+1 for bringing that up.
-- Paul
On 11/27/2013 午後 03:31, Doug McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:24:29AM +0900, Paul S. wrote:
From what I've seen, the license is mainly a 'nag license,' at least
26 matches
Mail list logo
