[j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Keegan Holley
Does anyone know why a BGP session would constantly flap because of an MTU mismatch. I'm sure it's MTU since that is what fixed the problem. The peering is between a cisco and a juniper and both support PMTU discovery. I would assume any mismatches would be settled by the TCP MSS negotiation or

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Ido Szargel
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keegan Holley Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:38 AM To: juniper-nsp Subject: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch Does anyone know why a BGP session would constantly flap because of an MTU mismatch. I'm sure it's MTU since that is what fixed the problem. The peering is between

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Alex
enabled. Otherwise it will assume 9192 bytes. Cheers Alex - Original Message - From: Ido Szargel i...@oasis-tech.net To: Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com; juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch Hi

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Abhi
Hi Keegan how did u solve the problem of bgp flap in first place.   Regards Abhijeet.C - Original Message - From: Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com To: juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:08 PM Subject: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch Does

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Keegan Holley
Keegan how did u solve the problem of bgp flap in first place. Regards Abhijeet.C - Original Message - From: Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com To: juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:08 PM Subject: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch Does anyone

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread randy.tay...@bell.ca
- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keegan Holley Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:29 AM To: Abhi Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch :) I found the MTU issue and fixed it because it was an obvious error. I don't see

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Alex
it will assume 9192 bytes. Cheers Alex - Original Message - From: Ido Szargel i...@oasis-tech.net To: Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com; juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Payam Chychi
code 4 with Next-hop MTU then yes http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1191.html Cheers Alex - Original Message - From: Keegan Holley To: Alex Cc: Ido Szargel ; juniper-nsp Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:27 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch I don't think

Re: [j-nsp] BGP MTU Mismatch

2011-06-22 Thread Abhi
I think it is the underlying TCP which is causing the problem Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp