Re: [j-nsp] BGP default action constraints with advertise-inactive?

2019-03-01 Thread Jason Lixfeld
To circle back to this, it seems to have had to do with my lack of clear comprehension about how subroutines actually work. The behaviour below makes much more sense now. > On Feb 23, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Wojciech Janiszewski > wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > "advertise-inactive" makes router to

Re: [j-nsp] BGP default action constraints with advertise-inactive?

2019-02-23 Thread Wojciech Janiszewski
Hi Jason, "advertise-inactive" makes router to advertise BGP route even if it is not active. One example is when you have a static and BGP route for the same prefix. By default, static route is preferred and BGP is marked as inactive. As such BGP route would not be advertised. By configuring

[j-nsp] BGP default action constraints with advertise-inactive?

2019-02-23 Thread Jason Lixfeld via juniper-nsp
Hello! I’m confused about some observations while testing BGP announcements of inactive routes. I’m hoping someone can offer some clue. I have this sample route: jlixfeld@mx# run show route table rifoo.inet.0 protocol static 44.44.44.0/21 detail rifoo.inet.0: 27 destinations, 29 routes (27