The motivation is that currently there are a number of devices peering with
a singular router... folks are interested in introducing another router for
redundancy and configuring them in a VRRP group. They aren't interested in
configuring secondary BGP sessions on a number of devices hence it was
Hello,
I'm no BGP guru but I can put in my guess on the "motivation" part:
Cost :) Atleast that was something we considered when planning our
multi-homing solution @work and not being completely fluent in BGP
yet :)
Consider the following setup:
2 routers, 2 peerings: 1 peering to router 1
0/0/0
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Stefan Fouant
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 9:22 AM
> To: juniper-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] BGP peering from a VIP address
>
> Hi folks,
>
> There is some
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> There is some internal debate here in my office today as to whether or not
> Juniper can support a BGP implementation in conjunction with VRRP, as in,
> BGP is sourced from a VRRP VIP address.
>
> Now before everyone attempts to tear me a new one... I sh
Hi folks,
There is some internal debate here in my office today as to whether or not
Juniper can support a BGP implementation in conjunction with VRRP, as in,
BGP is sourced from a VRRP VIP address.
Now before everyone attempts to tear me a new one... I should state that
I'm pretty sure this sho
5 matches
Mail list logo
