@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP strange Next hop behavior (in JNCIP)
Hello,
If you follow the topology and the tasks from the book you should not have
such issue. To help you we will need more information.
You are saying that the agg received from R5 is causing the IBGP session on
R3 to flap or
it used it as prefer which leaded to keep the sessions flap
> many
> time.
>
>
> From: Ivan Ivanov [mailto:ivanov.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 11:18 AM
> To: medrees
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP strange Next hop behavior (in
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP strange Next hop behavior (in JNCIP)
Hi,
You probably have the lo0.0 of R5 in level-2. So the IBGP session is using
the attached default route on R6 from R5 to reach the IBGP peer. When R6
gets the aggregate it contains the lo0.0 also. And the router is
Hi,
You probably have the lo0.0 of R5 in level-2. So the IBGP session is using
the attached default route on R6 from R5 to reach the IBGP peer. When R6
gets the aggregate it contains the lo0.0 also. And the router is falling in
the situation where it has to use this agg for keeping the IBGP sessio
Hi Expertise
Im wondering from strange behavior for two IBGP session included in
JNCIP_StudyGuide, I have one router make aggregation for the whole network
10/8(R5 in case study of EBGP) and where the routers inside the other ISIS
are level-1 routers (R1 & R6) so they reach the Level1-2 rout
5 matches
Mail list logo