❦ 27 mars 2017 21:15 GMT, Jeff Haas :
>> I totally understand it's not possible to just fix the issue. Your best
>> bet is to convert the draft into a RFC and fix the issue here! ;-)
>
> After checking with Jürgen about RFC 4001 encoding (no better answer!)
> he confirms that
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:15 PM, Jeff Haas wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>>
>> ❦ 27 mars 2017 19:26 GMT, Jeff Haas :
>>
>>> To your relevant next point: If the junos mib is in error, what to do about
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> ❦ 27 mars 2017 19:26 GMT, Jeff Haas :
>
>> To your relevant next point: If the junos mib is in error, what to do about
>> it?
>>
>> Very likely fixing the issue will cause mass amounts of
On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Vincent Bernat
> wrote:
❦ 27 mars 2017 19:26 GMT, Jeff Haas
> :
To your relevant next point: If the junos mib is in error, what to do about it?
Very likely fixing the issue will
❦ 27 mars 2017 19:26 GMT, Jeff Haas :
> To your relevant next point: If the junos mib is in error, what to do about
> it?
>
> Very likely fixing the issue will cause mass amounts of unhappiness as
> people's existing scripts and mib walking code fails due to the new
>
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>>> So, 192.0.2.47 should be encoded to 4.192.0.2.47.
>>
>> Probably no.
>>
>> The headache here is that the underlying type is RFC 4001's
>> InetAddress. As you can see in the documentation in that RFC the
>> expectation
❦ 27 mars 2017 16:10 GMT, Jeff Haas :
>> I have been reported a (simple) bug in the implementation of the
>> BGP4-V2-MIB-JUNIPER. I know that if I open a JTAC case about this, I
>> will be asked a lot of unrelated questions, then I would be told that
>> since this never
> On Jan 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> Hey!
>
> I have been reported a (simple) bug in the implementation of the
> BGP4-V2-MIB-JUNIPER. I know that if I open a JTAC case about this, I
> will be asked a lot of unrelated questions, then I would be told that
>
Hey!
I have been reported a (simple) bug in the implementation of the
BGP4-V2-MIB-JUNIPER. I know that if I open a JTAC case about this, I
will be asked a lot of unrelated questions, then I would be told that
since this never really worked, this is not the scope for JTAC.
So, as I know some
9 matches
Mail list logo