Re: [j-nsp] Collapse spine EVPN type 5 routes issue

Hi all, I think following command is the best way to only get loop 2 for EVPN routes, eBGP routes will still have loop 1 as control. set protocols bgp group OVERLAY-EVPN family evpn signaling loops 2 Regards Niklas Den fre 18 nov. 2022 kl 12:38 skrev Roger Wiklund : > Hi Niklas > > We always

Re: [j-nsp] Collapse spine EVPN type 5 routes issue

Hi Niklas We always use unique ASNs per device in the VRFs. Loop 2 should work fine, as-override also as previously mentioned. There's also a few knobs for RT5 you can play with: root@qfx5120-48y-02# set routing-instances test protocols evpn ip-prefix-routes route-attributes ? Possible

Re: [j-nsp] Collapse spine EVPN type 5 routes issue

I would still consider as-override, or at least I would figure out the reason why it is not a good solution. On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 15:40, niklas rehnberg via juniper-nsp wrote: > > Hi, > Thanks for the quick reply, I hope following very simple picture may help > >

Re: [j-nsp] Collapse spine EVPN type 5 routes issue

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply, I hope following very simple picture may help ClientsClients | | | EVPN/VXLAN| | Overlay

Re: [j-nsp] Collapse spine EVPN type 5 routes issue

Hey Niklas, My apologies, I do not understand your topology or what you are trying to do, and would need a lot more context. In my ignorance I would still ask, have you considered 'as-override' -

[j-nsp] Collapse spine EVPN type 5 routes issue

Hi all, I have the following setup and need to know the best practices to solve EVPN type 5 issues. Setup: Two ACX7100 as collapse spine with EVPN/VXLAN Using type 5 routes between the spines so iBGP can be avoided in routing-instance. Both spines has same bgp as number in the routing-instance