Hi Peter,
With disabling CNH for evpn you decouple L2 and L3 for evpn routes,
therefore the PE which receives an ARP for on specific host on
that LAN segment has to export this host route.
as proposed, i exported host routes with an additional term in my policy:
term evpn-host-routes {
Hi Alex,
Am 19.04.2018 um 14:48 schrieb Alex D.:
If yes, try to deactivate CNH for family evpn ingress,
I didn't configure chained-composite-nexthop explicitely, because it is
activated by junos-defaults. How can i deactivate it in this case ?
# set routing-option forwarding-table
Hi Peter
What is the status of the route on PE2?
The route is "active" and is falsely reacheable via the local irb.1002
a.b.c.d/n *[Static/5] 3d 01:33:57, tag 104
> to x.x.x.x via irb.1002
> show route forwarding-table destination a.b.c.d
Is it "hold"?
Yes it is "hold".
Destination
Hi Nitzan,
here's a diagramm which shows my current setup:
+--+
|MPLS CORE |
+--+
| |
| |
+---+ +---+
|P1 | |P2 |
+---+ +---+
| |
Hi Alex,
Am 18.04.2018 um 23:50 schrieb Alex D.:
Here's an example: VRRP master is attached at PE1. PE2 learns this VRRP
IP via an EVPN type-2 route from PE1. Now, an IP packet for a DMZ host
arrives at PE2 which has a static route pointing to the VRRP IP. PE2
doesn't label-switch the IP
Hello,
in our core network, we have an EVPN with IRB setup on 2 MX480. JUNOS is
17.3R1-S1.6.
Here are the relevant parts of my configuration:
routing-instance:
EVPN_TEST {
instance-type virtual-switch;
route-distinguisher x.x.x.x:1002;
vrf-target target:1002:10;
protocols {
6 matches
Mail list logo