Re: [j-nsp] EX4500 - 3rd party DAC/Twinax cable support - link-up at 1g instead of 10g

2012-06-21 Thread Dale Shaw
Hi all, Just following up on this post from April. My customer followed through with JTAC and eventually it was determined that, while active DAC cable support was planned for introduction in JUNOS 12.1, it didn't actually make it. References to active DAC cable support disappeared from various

Re: [j-nsp] EX4500 - 3rd party DAC/Twinax cable support - link-up at 1g instead of 10g

2012-04-29 Thread Tore Anderson
* Dale Shaw I have a customer that is trying to connect some ESX hosts at 10g to a recently commissioned EX4500 VC. Their ESX hosts are IBM servers, and they were supplied with the following DAC cables: Cable: IBM Twin-ax Active Cable 5M, PN: 45W3039 Cable labelled as: Brocade 10G

Re: [j-nsp] EX4500 - 3rd party DAC/Twinax cable support - link-up at 1g instead of 10g

2012-04-29 Thread Timh Bergström
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Tore Anderson tore.ander...@redpill-linpro.com wrote: * Dale Shaw I have a customer that is trying to connect some ESX hosts at 10g to a recently commissioned EX4500 VC. Their ESX hosts are IBM servers, and they were supplied with the following DAC cables:

[j-nsp] EX4500 - 3rd party DAC/Twinax cable support - link-up at 1g instead of 10g

2012-04-28 Thread Dale Shaw
Hi all, I have a customer that is trying to connect some ESX hosts at 10g to a recently commissioned EX4500 VC. Their ESX hosts are IBM servers, and they were supplied with the following DAC cables: Cable: IBM Twin-ax Active Cable 5M, PN: 45W3039 Cable labelled as: Brocade 10G Active 5M FCoE,