Re: [j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hi Dragan, > Dragan Jovicic [mailto:dragan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 11:08 PM > >> Hi, > >But since the policy is matching everything, then all routes in inet.3 will > >be >> altered right? > > More importantly all the routes in mpls.0. Since this is most likely a > bgp-free

Re: [j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hi, But since the policy is matching everything, then all routes in inet.3 will > be altered right? > More importantly all the routes in mpls.0. Since this is most likely a bgp-free router it could very well not use inet.3. But you can be more specific in your policy, see bellow. I suspect that

Re: [j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hi Dragan, Thank you very much for the response Please see the comments inline > Dragan Jovicic [mailto:dragan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 11:36 AM > > Hello, > In lab, tested and works as following. Traffic arrives as MPLS (LDP in control > plane) on a core router , and then is

Re: [j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hello, In lab, tested and works as following. Traffic arrives as MPLS (LDP in control plane) on a core router , and then is forced to whichever RSVP LSP depending on EXP bits. The key is to run LDP tunneling over RSVP LSPs - as the route in control plane must point over these tunnels. Traffic that

[j-nsp] EXP based LSP selection

Hi folks, How do ya’ll do the below in Junos? On a core router send EF traffic via one LSP and BE via other LSP. CR1: class-map type traffic match-any PBTS_C-MAP_EF match mpls experimental topmost 5 end-class-map ! policy-map type pbr PBTS_P-MAP class type traffic PBTS_C-MAP_EF set forward-