2009/9/24 Chris Kawchuk juniperd...@gmail.com
Yep. 30 ACL's with no issues (assuming straightforward things). Full BGP
Tables, OSPF area 0.0.0.0 inside, QoS, IPSEC.
I'd warn you guys of running peers with full BGP on J series with 1 Gig of
RAM. It was not a problem till 9.4. But since 9.4
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for your input.
Based on factsheets the J series outperform BGP capabilities of the SRX
series. The only out that outperform in SRX is the 650 which looks like a
real good deal (thanks for pointing it out to me!).
Nice weekend.
- Gregory
2009/9/26 Pavel Lunin
if you running flow based JUNOS , you could try this knob to turn it into
packet based mode:
security {
forwarding-options {
family {
mpls {
mode packet-based;
}
}
}
}
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Pavel Lunin plu...@senetsy.ru wrote:
2009/9/24
Sorry to reply to myself, but I meant outperform J series, in the same
factor-size and price range.
2009/9/26 Gregory Agerba gregory.age...@gmail.com
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for your input.
Based on factsheets the J series outperform BGP capabilities of the SRX
series. The only out that
Hi 陈江,
You're right, this should be almost always done if you run several external
peers with fullview, but this code only switches the box into router
context. It doesn't make fwdd to free the memory. The router I used to show
the fwdd memory consumption is also given this piece of config.
I
Ups, I really missed the number of BGP routes limitation for SRX240. Sorry.
However 300K stated in the datasheet is not a hard limit for J series. It is
only a number well known to be supported with no issues. I wonder if this is
different for SRX.
But anyway BGP RR license is only available for
If you don't wanna pay $800:
http://blog.linuxtoyz.com/?p=24
Full feed is not a problem. My J2300 with 1 GB RAM does that easily =)
// Olof
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Truman Boyes tru...@suspicious.org wrote:
Or rather OpenBGPD and XORP generate JUNOS-like configuration files. :)
On
I am running J2320s high mem version as BGP gateway with ACLs and OSPF
towards other stuff on the inside. My company is a Webhotel. I have a
full feed coming down from my ISP.
I have about 10 Mbps concurrent traffic all the time and a couple of
thousand concurrent sessions.
I NEVER had a problem
Hi,
I am currently looking after a review for a pair of Juniper J2350.
The purpose is to build a mission-critical Internet access with two ISP (one
on each box running full table) and have a VRRP fault tolerance and with a
small budget. It is not for pushing huge traffic, I expect around 1 to 3
The purpose is to build a mission-critical Internet access with two
ISP (one
on each box running full table) and have a VRRP fault tolerance and
with a
small budget. It is not for pushing huge traffic, I expect around 1
to 3
Mbit average and some rare peaks at 8 - 10 Mbit during backup
Chris, thanks for your input.
I've seen much more in 1 Gb of RAM.; however 300k routes is fine for the
global routing table. (which is ~290k or so). You'd have room-to-spare.
Good. Juniper probably ensure at least 300k routes, with other features
turned on.
Yes. I've worked with J4350's
Or rather OpenBGPD and XORP generate JUNOS-like configuration files. :)
On 25/09/2009, at 12:45 AM, Gregory Agerba wrote:
I've seen JunOS generates nice OpenBGPd-like configuration files.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
12 matches
Mail list logo
