It apears term 3 is far below term 1 and term 2. It appears ping and
Telnet traffic from 192.168.4.128/26 would match terms ping and telnet;
therefore, they will never hit term 3 and not use filter-based forwarding.
Does this explain the behavior you are seeing?
If so, I believe the
Hi,
I have ran into an issue with the following on a J2350 (JUNOS Software
Release [9.2R1.10] (Export edition) Enhanced Services)
Presently the client has the following address range 192.168.4.0/24 which
as can be seen below to be at the
next-hop address of 212.111.105.238 which is directly
Hello There,
I've exprienced weird behaviour of FBF - it doesn't work at all :).
Suppose there is a very simple filter:
# show firewall family inet filter FILTER_INSTANCE_TO
term C {
from {
source-prefix-list {
PLIST_C;
}
}
then {
count ccount;
Could you provide the configuration snippets for the
routing-options, routing-instances, and a 'show route
summary' output.
--- Gniewko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello There,
I've exprienced weird behaviour of FBF - it doesn't
work at all :).
Suppose there is a very simple filter:
# show
4 matches
Mail list logo