Hi,
I am trying to uplink traffic for some of my customers via ISP-1 using
routing-instance on an M-series route (relevant config snippet
attached).
routing-instances {
uplink-to-ISP1-ri {
instance-type forwarding;
routing-options {
static {
route
Is there a specific reason for not having made use of BGP to handle
the failover to your upstream provider(s)? Depending on how you
connect to them, you may or may not require a /24 and your own ASN to
provide proper redundancy. You could even get by with only receiving
a default route from
Hi,
Thanks for the input David. Let me clarify; I am getting default route
from my upstreams via BGP. But as I mentioned, I want to uplink the
traffic of some specific customers via one upstream and in case that
upstream goes down, I want the traffic to take an alternate path. In
Cisco we used to
Junaid schrieb:
Hi,
Thanks for the input David. Let me clarify; I am getting default route
from my upstreams via BGP. But as I mentioned, I want to uplink the
traffic of some specific customers via one upstream and in case that
upstream goes down, I want the traffic to take an alternate
4 matches
Mail list logo