Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why?

2009-07-21 Thread Hendrik Kahmann
regards, Hendrik -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net] Gesendet: Montag, 20. Juli 2009 23:22 An: Hendrik Kahmann; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Betreff: RE: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why? I assume that the related protocol and indirect

Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why?

2009-07-21 Thread Pekka Savola
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Hendrik Kahmann wrote: m...@machine2 show route table inet6.0 2001:7b0::/32 hidden inet6.0: 184 destinations, 189 routes (37 active, 0 holddown, 147 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both 2001:7b0::/32 [BGP ] 11:39:05, MED 101, localpref 100, from

[j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why?

2009-07-20 Thread Hendrik Kahmann
Hello, we have a problem with a IPv6 route in the lab, which is hidden for us. What could be the reason for that? In the most documents we can only find information around next-hop unusable but this does not seem to be the reason for us. Following excerpt has been grabbed from one of our

Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why?

2009-07-20 Thread Hendrik Kahmann
Hello, thanks for your comment! We are not using a RR at the edge of this scenario but the problem is located on another location. 1. The routes are received from a RR and advertised to one of our core systems. 2. From here the routes are propageted to our iBGP which is IPv6 enabled.

Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why?

2009-07-20 Thread Harry Reynolds
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hendrik Kahmann Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 1:52 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why? Hello, thanks for your comment! We are not using a RR at the edge of this scenario but the problem is located on another