regards,
Hendrik
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 20. Juli 2009 23:22
An: Hendrik Kahmann; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Betreff: RE: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why?
I assume that the related protocol and indirect
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Hendrik Kahmann wrote:
m...@machine2 show route table inet6.0 2001:7b0::/32 hidden
inet6.0: 184 destinations, 189 routes (37 active, 0 holddown, 147 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
2001:7b0::/32 [BGP ] 11:39:05, MED 101, localpref 100, from
Hello,
we have a problem with a IPv6 route in the lab, which is hidden for us. What
could be the reason for that? In the most documents we can only find
information around next-hop unusable but this does not seem to be the
reason for us.
Following excerpt has been grabbed from one of our
Hello,
thanks for your comment!
We are not using a RR at the edge of this scenario but the problem is
located on another location.
1. The routes are received from a RR and advertised to one of our core
systems.
2. From here the routes are propageted to our iBGP which is IPv6
enabled.
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hendrik Kahmann
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 1:52 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv6 Route inside BGP - but why?
Hello,
thanks for your comment!
We are not using a RR at the edge of this scenario but the problem is located
on another
5 matches
Mail list logo