Re: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small?

2010-03-10 Thread Joerg Staedele
Fouant; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small? Prior to ISSU, I don't suppose you noted the uptime of the replicated BGP sessions on your backup RE? We're about to do a major code upgrade to fix numerous things, one of which involves the premature cl

Re: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small?

2010-03-10 Thread David Ball
[mailto:juniper-nsp- >> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joerg Staedele >> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:26 AM >> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> Subject: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small? >> >> Hi there, >> >> i just tried ISSU (9.5R3 to 9.

Re: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small?

2010-03-10 Thread Joerg Staedele
No BFD... -Originalnachricht- Von: Stefan Fouant Gesendet: Mi 10.03.2010 21:21 An: 'Joerg Staedele';juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Betreff: RE: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small? Are you using BFD by any chance? Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net

Re: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small?

2010-03-10 Thread Stefan Fouant
rch 10, 2010 9:26 AM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small? > > Hi there, > > i just tried ISSU (9.5R3 to 9.5R4) on a MX240 and it FAILED .. but it > seems that it just failed because after rebooting the (upgraded) Backup > RE, the NS

[j-nsp] ISSU Timeouts too small?

2010-03-10 Thread Joerg Staedele
Hi there, i just tried ISSU (9.5R3 to 9.5R4) on a MX240 and it FAILED .. but it seems that it just failed because after rebooting the (upgraded) Backup RE, the NSR for BGP wasn't syncing fast enough and then the whole ISSU was aborted. Log shows: Mar 10 15:25:49 chassisd[1240]: CHASSISD_ISSU_D