Comments in-line...
On 4/24/2012 1:48 PM, Clarke Morledge wrote:
Stefan,
I was just hunting through your blog for ideas when I saw your post :-)
Thanks for jumping in. A few responses in-line below.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Stefan Fouant wrote:
If that adjacency goes down, a simple floating
Stefan,
I was just hunting through your blog for ideas when I saw your post :-)
Thanks for jumping in. A few responses in-line below.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Stefan Fouant wrote:
If that adjacency goes down, a simple floating static (static route w/ higher
preference than the dynamic BGP/IS
On 4/24/2012 12:44 PM, Clarke Morledge wrote:
I have a design question to propose to the list. Suppose I have two VRFs
in my MX routing core. Servers connect to one VRF (South) and the
clients connect to the other VRF (North). I have a Layer2 security
packet scrubbing box for inspecting traffic b
I have a design question to propose to the list. Suppose I have two VRFs in my
MX routing core. Servers connect to one VRF (South) and the clients connect to
the other VRF (North). I have a Layer2 security packet scrubbing box for
inspecting traffic between my servers and clients.
I have a
4 matches
Mail list logo