I don't have the book with me right now to check, but I tried your setup
without succes:)
A workaround for this would be a generated default route on R4 when
8.8.8.8 exists in customer.inet.0
mihai@mx#run show route table customer.inet.0 0.0.0.0/0 exact
customer.inet.0: 8 destinations, 8
Hi,
Did you try to configure policy matching those routes and use it for *
vrf-export*?
The other option that I am thinking is to use *auto-export.* Because BGP is
advertising only the primary route. With *auto-export* the routes will be
looking like not coming from BGP process. But this is not
Hi,
Make R4 RR for R1 (family inet unicast) and it should work. You will have
further intricacy on R3 accepting this route because R4 vpn-inet family
will not reset next-hop self automatically. In order to fix this you should
apply nhs for this route through explicit vrf-export policy.
The
Hi guys,
Now I'm preparing for JNCIE-SP certification, and faced with problem providing
internet-access for VPN users.
I attach my test topology to email.
R4 and R3 are PE routers which holds vrf table Customer, R1 router holds ipv4
static route 8.8.8.8/32 to represent Internet routes. Between
topology in txt format, since .jpeg hasn't attached:
(R2)--vrf Customer-(R4)-(core)-(R1)-|8.8.8.8/32 static route in inet.0
to emulate Internet routes
|
|
(R3)
Hello,
Maybe I am wrong, but as long as R1,R3,R4 are internal bgp neighbors,
R4 should be route reflector for R4.
Regards,
Mihai
On 06/04/2013 06:44 PM, Alexey wrote:
Hi guys,
Now I'm preparing for JNCIE-SP certification, and faced with problem providing
internet-access for VPN users.
I
Hi Alexey,
I understand that you receive an iBGP route, place it in another VRF via
rib-group, and expect it to be sent to another iBGP peer.
Well, basically you expect a received iBGP route to be reflected to another
iBGP peer ?
regards,
Olivier Benghozi
Le 4 juin 2013 à 18:12, Alexey
7 matches
Mail list logo
