Hi Peter. If I understand correctly, you're expecting that the
pseudowire connecting your J42 and J43 VPLS endpoints will
re-establish itself using the LSPs that those routers have to
J41...essentially transiting through J41 using 2 individual LSPs.
Unfortunately that won't work by default, sinc
David,
Each of the routers are running RSVP as the core MPLS protocol on the core
facing interfaces in other words, we are not running LDP on the core.
To clarify, these are VPLS connections. If you can visualize a ring type
configuration where the top node BOXLABJ41 has a connection to BOXLA
On 28 September 2011 14:27, Peter K wrote:
>
> Goal is to deploy label switch routers specifically functioning only as PE
> (distribution) nodes with direct connectivity to the P\PE (core) nodes and
> avoid the configuration required for a full mesh of LSP’s and l2vpn
> signaling between the P\PE
I was wondering if anyone is out there with experience supporting a BGP
based layer 2 VPLS\VPN environment using RSVP to signal pseudo-wire access.
Below is an outline of the general P\PE core configuration.
· The core network comprised of P\PE LSR’s
· BGP based RSVP based l2vp
4 matches
Mail list logo