Re: [j-nsp] Issue with pseudo-wire attempting to establish across non LSP path

Hi Peter. If I understand correctly, you're expecting that the pseudowire connecting your J42 and J43 VPLS endpoints will re-establish itself using the LSPs that those routers have to J41...essentially transiting through J41 using 2 individual LSPs. Unfortunately that won't work by default, sinc

Re: [j-nsp] Issue with pseudo-wire attempting to establish across non LSP path

David, Each of the routers are running RSVP as the core MPLS protocol on the core facing interfaces in other words, we are not running LDP on the core. To clarify, these are VPLS connections. If you can visualize a ring type configuration where the top node BOXLABJ41 has a connection to BOXLA

Re: [j-nsp] Issue with pseudo-wire attempting to establish across non LSP path

On 28 September 2011 14:27, Peter K wrote: > > Goal is to deploy label switch routers specifically functioning only as PE > (distribution) nodes with direct connectivity to the P\PE (core) nodes and > avoid the configuration required for a full mesh of LSP’s and l2vpn > signaling between the P\PE

[j-nsp] Issue with pseudo-wire attempting to establish across non LSP path

I was wondering if anyone is out there with experience supporting a BGP based layer 2 VPLS\VPN environment using RSVP to signal pseudo-wire access. Below is an outline of the general P\PE core configuration. · The core network comprised of P\PE LSR’s · BGP based RSVP based l2vp