On 23/Feb/16 15:37, Aaron wrote:
> I had a couple different flavors of Cisco ASR920 in my lab recently but
> dropped it from consideration since it top'ed out at (6) 10 gig interfaces.
> I opted for the Juniper ACX5048 since it's got (48) 10 gig and (6) 40 gig -
> so a possible total of (72) 10
ohan Borch
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper ACX
On 9/Feb/16 17:34, Saku Ytti wrote:
> ACX covers many boxes with different HW. ACX2k is BRCM Enduro, as is
> Cisco ASR901. My comments are about ACX2k.
>
>
> VPLS is not supported, and I don't think
On 9/Feb/16 17:34, Saku Ytti wrote:
> ACX covers many boxes with different HW. ACX2k is BRCM Enduro, as is
> Cisco ASR901. My comments are about ACX2k.
>
>
> VPLS is not supported, and I don't think it ever will be.
>
> Only way to protect control-plane would be forwarding filter where you
> mat
Thanks for the replies :)
Johan
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On 9 February 2016 at 17:10, Johan Borch wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> > Would ACX-series be a good box for L2VPN terminations? I can't find any
> > information that VPLS is supported yet, seems to be supported in some
>
On 9 February 2016 at 17:10, Johan Borch wrote:
Hey,
> Would ACX-series be a good box for L2VPN terminations? I can't find any
> information that VPLS is supported yet, seems to be supported in some 15..
> version. Anyone with experience with for example filter/policy BUM traffic
> and BPDUs? Do
ACX500 platform, tested with a
loan device.
Cheers,
Theo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: juniper-nsp im Auftrag von Johan
Borch
Datum: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2016 um 16:10
An: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Betreff: [j-nsp] Juniper ACX
Hi!
I'm trying to find out more in
Hi!
I'm trying to find out more information about junipers ACX series, their
web is kind of sparse.
Would ACX-series be a good box for L2VPN terminations? I can't find any
information that VPLS is supported yet, seems to be supported in some 15..
version. Anyone with experience with for example f
7 matches
Mail list logo